Connect with us

News

Remake Double Take: Poltergeist 1982 vs 2015

Published

on

Poltergeist

It seems like every time we turn around, some horror movie is being remade for whatever reason. But are the remakes ever any good? I decided to start Remake Double Take, a series that pits tried and true classics against their remakes. For my first edition, I thought I would review a perfect example of how modern remakes can get it horribly wrong. You may feel differently about the 2015 remake, but personally I think it doesn’t hold a candle to 1982’s Poltergeist.

Poltergeist is one of my favorite movies. I’ll just put that out there. So with the recent and tragic passing of director Tobe Hooper, now seemed like the perfect time to revisit one of his classics. And full disclosure, I hate the remake. I think it’s sloppy, it’s stupid, and frankly it tries way too hard. Now, again, this is all my own opinion, so bear with me here while I explain my arguments.

via Disqus

1982’s Poltergeist opens with a close-up of the TV playing the Star Spangled Banner before cutting to harsh static. The camera follows the family dog to carry us through the quiet house, passing through rooms where everyone is peacefully asleep. It sets up an intimacy with the audience; we feel like we’re an observer in the lives of the family on screen.

Young Carol Anne gets up from bed and creeps downstairs. She is drawn to the TV, having a loud conversation with an unknown entity, which wakes up the family to all come and observe this odd behavior. This is great for two reasons. It shows the family as a unit, presenting a united front, and it allows all characters to see this preliminary interaction so that everyone is an informed participant in the strange events to follow.

via Deep Focus Review

Now, let’s compare with the 2015 remake. We open on a close-up of a violent horror video game, then pan out to see that it’s played by the son while in the car with his family. There’s some banter that’s meant to communicate that they’re a fun, normal family, but it’s just awkward. They arrive at the new house where the kids run off to – I don’t know, be kids I guess – while the parents meet with the real estate agent.

The agent asks the father, Eric (Sam Rockwell, who can do better than this), what he does for a living, he says that he works at (a shameless product placement for) John Deere. The agent praises their tractors (again it’s super awkward) and Eric responds that he “would be very flattered right now if he hadn’t got laid off”.

via Turn The Right Corner

I’m sorry, but what? That’s not how conversations work. You can’t say “I’m dating John, but he dumped me”. See how dumb that sounds? This writer can’t dialogue. The scene is designed to provide the information that this is a move out of necessity due to their economic position, but there’s a much better way to write that.

Anyways, the son, Griffin, wanders through the house and finds the youngest daughter, Madison, talking to her closed closet door. And at 6 minutes and 28 seconds in, we have our first attempted jump scare. Because nothing sets up a scary movie like premature jump scares. Of course, Griffin is the only one who observes this strange exchange, and it’s easily attributed to kids just being weird.

via Minnesota Connected

Which does the film a huge disservice. I understand that they’re trying to slowly sink into the waters of “horror” here, but by wasting so much time with needless exposition and awkward character moments, it completely misses the opportunity to build atmosphere. It just kind of underhand tosses in this “creepy” scene, then does nothing with it until the situation full on explodes several scenes later.

One of the greatest things about the 1982 film is the portrayal of the family. The parents have a wonderful chemistry with each other and with their kids. Steve (Craig T Nelson) and Dianne (JoBeth Williams) end the day be retiring to their bedroom to unwind as a unit, and when shit hits the fan they completely support each other. Total relationship goals.

via LightsCameraVegan

In contrast, 2015’s Poltergeist shows a shallow connection between Eric and Amy (Rosemarie DeWitt), and they don’t actually have any strong bond with their children. Eric tries to buy their affection with lavish gifts – using money they don’t have – and plays a passive role in the actual parenting. When young Madison is taken by the entities, the family gathers and attempts to contact her with help from Dr. Powell (Jane Adams). Once they finally hear her voice, their reaction is… not convincing at all.  I mean, overall the acting in the remake is really, really weak, so it’s very hard to actually give a shit about any of the terrible characters.

The same scene from the original shows true skill from JoBeth Williams. You can feel her relief, mixed with devastating horror. It’s beautiful.

When it comes time to rescue their young daughter from the other side, 1982’s Poltergeist sends Dianne to cross over and save her. It’s a heartwarming statement on the power of a mother’s love; Dianne is a strong, capable character who would do anything for her children. The whole team bands together to physically hold the rope that connects Dianne to the safety of home.

via WordPress

In the remake, the rescue is performed by the son – Griffin – which… is stupid. Now, there’s a whole storyline about how Griffin is afraid of the dark and he’s anxious about life in general, so, sure, let’s empower the kid. But frankly, that whole bit is completely unnecessary, and it undermines the role of the parents in a big way. Also, they trust a wall anchor with the safety of their children, so…

Speaking of the children (won’t somebody please think of the children), there’s the clown doll. The doll in the original Poltergeist is mostly normal, so when he transforms, it’s terrifying. The remake tries way too goddamn hard to make it scary.

On that note, everyone knows that clowns can be pretty damn creepy, so when your already skittish child finds a box full of clown dolls in a crawlspace in their attic/bedroom, maybe – and this is just a thought – get rid of them?

via Forces of Geek

Also, just to note this, when the possessed tree bursts in through the window in Poltergeist, it’s genuinely scary. In the remake, the tree impossibly snakes through the house – through a room and down the hall – to grab young Griffin and drag him out the window. It’s absurd and it just looks silly.

Once the family escapes, the original Poltergeist ends with the iconic implosion of the house. It’s tidy, it’s final, and it shows that they just narrowly avoided the same fate. In the remake, just as the family loads into the van, convinced that their nightmare is over, the house pulls the van in through the wall of the house like a goddamn mechanical Kool-Aid man.

via Giphy

The big reveal that they “left the bodies but only moved the headstones” is dropped casually mid-conversation in the remake. The whole power of that scene is not even on the radar. And there’s CGI skeletons. Lord help me.

Lastly, Zelda fucking Rubinstein is way better than some bullshit romantic subplot. And that stupid #thishouseisclean reality show. Ugh.

via Giphy

Basically, I feel like the writer and director of the remake didn’t know anything about the original Poltergeist. I’m pretty sure they just saw some screenshots and read the plot description. It may have the skeleton of the original film, but it has none of the heart.

While the original has themes about family and the lack of morality from the housing developers, the remake crams in a bunch of cheap jump scares and updated technology (drones are so hip, you guys).

In conclusion, I hate it, and the original is untouchable in my books. Now, I need a drink.

Stay tuned for more ramblings about movies that deserved better, here on Remake Double Take.

'Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire' Popcorn Bucket

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

New Poster Reveal For Nicolas Cage’s Survival Creature Feature ‘Arcadian’ [Trailer]

Published

on

Nicolas Cage Arcadian

In the latest cinematic venture featuring Nicolas Cage, Arcadian emerges as a compelling creature feature, teeming with suspense, horror, and emotional depth. RLJE Films has recently released a series of new images and a captivating poster, offering audiences a glimpse into the eerie and thrilling world of “Arcadian”. Scheduled to hit theaters on April 12, 2024, the film will later be available on Shudder and AMC+, ensuring a wide audience can experience its gripping narrative.

Arcadian Movie Trailer

The Motion Picture Association (MPA) has given this film an “R” rating for its “bloody images,” hinting at the visceral and intense experience awaiting viewers. The film draws inspiration from acclaimed horror benchmarks like “A Quiet Place,” weaving a post-apocalyptic tale of a father and his two sons navigating a desolate world. Following a catastrophic event that depopulates the planet, the family faces the dual challenge of surviving their dystopian environment and eluding mysterious nocturnal creatures.

Joining Nicolas Cage in this harrowing journey are Jaeden Martell, known for his role in “IT” (2017), Maxwell Jenkins from “Lost in Space,” and Sadie Soverall, featured in “Fate: The Winx Saga.” Directed by Ben Brewer (“The Trust”) and penned by Mike Nilon (“Braven”), “Arcadian” promises a unique blend of poignant storytelling and electrifying survival horror.

Maxwell Jenkins, Nicolas Cage, and Jaeden Martell 

Critics have already begun to praise “Arcadian” for its imaginative monster designs and exhilarating action sequences, with one review from Bloody Disgusting highlighting the film’s balance between emotional coming-of-age elements and heart-pounding horror. Despite sharing thematic elements with similar genre films, “Arcadian” sets itself apart through its creative approach and action-driven plot, promising a cinematic experience filled with mystery, suspense, and relentless thrills.

Arcadian Official Movie Poster

'Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire' Popcorn Bucket

Continue Reading

News

‘Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey 3’ Is a Go with Enhanced Budget and New Characters

Published

on

Winnie the Pooh 3

Wow, they’re churning things out fast! The upcoming sequel “Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey 3” is officially moving forward, promising an expanded narrative with a larger budget and the introduction of beloved characters from A.A. Milne’s original tales. As confirmed by Variety, the third installment in the horror franchise will welcome Rabbit, the heffalumps, and the woozles into its dark and twisted narrative.

This sequel is a part of an ambitious cinematic universe that reimagines children’s stories as horror tales. Alongside “Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey” and its first sequel, the universe includes films such as “Peter Pan’s Neverland Nightmare”, “Bambi: The Reckoning,” and “Pinocchio Unstrung”. These movies are set to converge in the crossover event “Poohniverse: Monsters Assemble,” slated for a 2025 release.

Winnie the Pooh Poohniverse

The creation of these films was made possible when A.A. Milne’s 1926 children’s book “Winnie-the-Pooh” entered the public domain last year, allowing filmmakers to explore these cherished characters in unprecedented ways. Director Rhys Frake-Waterfield and producer Scott Jeffrey Chambers, of Jagged Edge Productions, have led the charge in this innovative endeavor.

The inclusion of Rabbit, heffalumps, and woozles in the upcoming sequel introduces a new layer to the franchise. In Milne’s original stories, heffalumps are imagined creatures resembling elephants, while woozles are known for their weasel-like characteristics and a penchant for stealing honey. Their roles in the narrative remain to be seen, but their addition promises to enrich the horror universe with deeper connections to the source material.

'Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire' Popcorn Bucket

Continue Reading

News

How to Watch ‘Late Night with the Devil’ from Home: Dates and Platforms

Published

on

Late Night With The Devil

For fans eager to dive into one of this year’s most talked-about horror films from the comfort of their own home, “Late Night with the Devil” will be available for streaming exclusively on Shudder starting April 19, 2024. This announcement has been highly anticipated following the film’s successful theatrical release by IFC Films, which saw it earning rave reviews and a record-breaking opening weekend for the distributor.

“Late Night with the Devil” emerges as a standout horror film, captivating audiences and critics alike, with Stephen King himself offering high praise for the 1977-set film. Starring David Dastmalchian, the movie unfolds on Halloween night during a live late-night talk show broadcast that disastrously unleashes evil across the nation. This found footage-style film not only delivers scares but also authentically captures the aesthetic of the 1970s, drawing viewers into its nightmarish scenario.

David Dastmalchian in Late Night with the Devil

The film’s initial box office success, opening to $2.8 million in 1,034 theaters, underscores its wide appeal and marks the highest opening weekend for an IFC Films release. Critically acclaimed, “Late Night with the Devil” boasts a 96% positive rating on Rotten Tomatoes from 135 reviews, with the consensus praising it for rejuvenating the possession horror genre and showcasing David Dastmalchian’s exceptional performance.

Rotten Tomatoes score as of 3/28/2024

Simon Rother of iHorror.com encapsulates the film’s allure, emphasizing its immersive quality that transports viewers back to the 1970s, making them feel as if they are part of the eerie “Night Owls” Halloween broadcast. Rother lauds the film for its meticulously crafted script and the emotional and shocking journey it takes viewers on, stating, “This whole experience will have viewers of the Cairnes brothers’ film glued to their screen… The script, from beginning to end, is neatly sewn together with an ending that’ll have jaws on the floor.” You can read the full review here.

Rother further encourages audiences to watch the film, highlighting its multifaceted appeal: “Whenever it is made available to you, you must attempt to view the Cairnes Brothers’ latest project as it will make you laugh, it will creep you out, it will amaze you, and it might even strike an emotional cord.”

Set to stream on Shudder on April 19, 2024, “Late Night with the Devil” offers a compelling blend of horror, history, and heart. This film is not just a must-watch for horror aficionados but for anyone looking to be thoroughly entertained and moved by a cinematic experience that redefines the boundaries of its genre.

'Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire' Popcorn Bucket

Continue Reading

Embed Gif with Clickable Title