The Conjuring Has No Gore And Very Little Violence

1
144

The Conjuring, a horror movie, with no gore and very little violence, infamously netted itself an R-rating from the Motion Picture Association of America for being “too scary.” Too scary! Based on true events, “The Conjuring” follows the Perron family (Ron Livingston and Lili Taylor play husband and wife) who seek the help of paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren (Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga) after some very bizarre events happen in their newly purchased farmhouse.

The Conjuring

Here, Wan discusses his intensely scary movie and the events that inspired them with Mike Ryan – a senior writer for Huffington Post Entertainment

This movie is very scary, but I think even non-horror fans will like this movie.
Definitely. I think that was really the plan, you know? We basically set out to make a drama — that’s basically what it is. The movie really is a drama about a family that is moving to a house and dealing with a situation that they have. And it’s also about another family and what they’re going through as well. And it just so happens that what they’re both going through is that of the supernatural. But it could have been any kind of situation, really.

It kind of has a “Poltergeist” vibe to it.
Here’s the thing: The really interesting fact is that I think, in a lot of ways, “Poltergeist” — especially when the paranormal people and the psychic came to help out the family — I think [Zelda Rubinstein’s character] was, in a lot of ways, based on Lorraine Warren. So, even back then, they were pretty well known already.

Also because there are some non-believers of this sort of stuff camped out at the house, too.
And, yeah, from a faith standpoint, it happens to a family that’s not really “of faith,” so to speak. Yet, the Warrens, it didn’t really matter to them and ended up helping them anyway.

THE-CONJURING-Movie-Poster-625x350

The faith aspect is interesting. This is based on a true story, and as a viewer I want to take the Perron family at their word, but I would have to accept so much else on top of that …
I know what you mean. You kind of have to accept all the baggage that comes with going along with who they say they are, right?

I feel that if I choose to believe the Perron family’s story as fact, I also feel that I have to accept the entire Catholic faith as fact, too.
Well, let me ask you: A lot of people just go along with “The Exorcist,” right? And that is an extremely faith-based movie. But even non-believers just kind of go along with it, just because they love the film. I guess what I say with this particular movie is, well, I’m not here to ask you to believe in what they believe, so to speak. But this is who the characters are and this is what makes them tick. And this is the journey they’ve gone on.

For sure. It doesn’t affect my enjoyment of the film, but it’s impossible not to ask myself “Did this stuff actually happen?”
[Laughs] Yeah, I know exactly what you mean, yes.

CJD-11237r-jpg_200430

You got yourself an R rating for just “being too scary,” even though there’s nothing too gory or anything like that in the film. Was that almost a point of pride?
I’m not quite sure how to feel about that. When that first happened, I really set out to make a movie that, yes, from a content level, it really ticked all of the boxes that the MPAA would have wanted for a PG-13. I was very cautious and very mindful of how much to show, because the movie is actually not very violent in any way at all.

So you were trying to shoot a PG-13 movie?
In some ways, I was keeping that in the back of my mind. Only because I did not want to make a very violent movie at all. So, when you’re setting out to do that, you go, “OK, maybe because this is a PG-13 film?” But, now having said that, I wasn’t quite sure what rating I was going to get, per se. Because I was kind of straddling that fine line and, at the end of the day, I really feel like I’ve made a grown up movie. And, so, the R rating, to me, isn’t really a factor, so to speak.

Correct me if I’m wrong: I feel from reading some quotes that you’ve given that you aren’t 100 percent pleased where the “Saw” franchise went after you left.
Well, OK, let me clarify that. I’m extremely grateful for what the “Saw” franchise has given me. And I think it’s really hard and I think they did an amazing job with all of the sequels, knowing how tricky it is. Because the movie is such a pretzel puzzle box of a film. And to try and continue that formula, it’s very tricky. And the fact that they made, basically, six sequels from that is quite impressive. And the fact that the fans love it adamantly is an even more amazing thing. Here’s my only thing: I guess I feel like the sequel ultimately ended up focusing on the wrong things. I felt that people kind of missed the point of the first movie. That it wasn’t just about the blood and the guts and the gory stuff, right? It had a cool twist. It had a cool storyline. It found kind of a new angle to a serial killer story. And, so, that was the only thing that I felt it could have stayed more closer to the first film.

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here