Connect with us

News

Tokenism, Coding, Baiting, and a Few Other Things LGBTQ Horror Fans are Over, Part 1

Published

on

Tokenism

It’s 2019! All is well and right with the world and representation and diversity is the rule and things like tokenism don’t happen anymore!

Wait…that’s not right.

Oh yeah, it’s 2019 and queer-coding, queer-baiting, tokenism, and a whole host of negative stereotypes surrounding the queer community are still the order of the day.

Oh sure, we’ve seen a handful of decent examples in recent years, but by and large, those have come from independent films with no major backing and no wide release, many of which slip into obscurity–not for lack of trying on those filmmakers parts, mind you. I know a lot of those men and women out there busting their tails to get their films to a larger audience and I respect and applaud them for it.

At the same time, a large percentage of the queer people I know love horror films. It’s their preferred genre. So why is it that we can’t get a decent queer portrayal in the genre we love?

Right now some of our straight readers are wondering what the hell some of those terms I mentioned mean, and I promise we’re getting to that. First, though I would like for you, specifically, to imagine something for me.

Ready?

Imagine there’s a genre of movies you love. Let’s say, horror. You like the scares. You like the tension. Heck, you even like the villains!

Now imagine never seeing yourself, and by yourself I mean someone who looks and loves like you, on the screen in those movies. You never see a guy kiss a girl unless it’s a stunt. You never see a straight man or woman portrayed as a real person.

You are never the hero.

On occasion, there’s a character with traits that kind of, maybe, make you think they might be straight. You watch the way they walk, their mannerisms, the way that they express themselves, and your heart races because “oh-my-god, I think they’re really straight but the filmmaker just didn’t come out and say it.”

Most of the time, that character is the villain.

Take it further and imagine that you’ve been hearing about this horror movie where–gasp!–there’s an actual straight character in the film! You rush out to the theater; you’re invested in this movie and even more in the character. They are, finally, revealed to be straight! Then they die 2.5 seconds later, or worse they become a stereotype of who straight people are.

If you can imagine, fully, that world I’m describing, then you’re beginning to understand why countless queer genre fans get frustrated with the movies and the people making them.

Now, lets get started with the first of those terms I mentioned before.

Tokenism

Tokenism is defined in the dictionary as “the practice of making only a perfunctory or symbolic effort to do a particular thing, especially by recruiting a small number of people from underrepresented groups in order to give the appearance of sexual or racial equality.”

This practice, especially in the U.S. grew out of a response to desegregation laws wherein an employer would hire one black employee for a basic, low-wage job in order to give the appearance that they were acting in accordance with the law.

This one happens a lot not only with queer characters but also with a multitude of racial minorities on the screen in the genre.

It’s easy to spot a token character. You look for, generally, the one out and proud queer character on screen who is obviously going through the process of coming out and having some kind of feelings about it. You might, but probably don’t, give them long enough to be an established part of the group. Then you kill them.

Sometimes, the writers of these films will even go so far as to try to trick you into believing that what you’re seeing isn’t a token character–they’re getting better at this.

Let’s take, for example, 2018’s Truth or Dare. The film centers on a group of college students who find themselves on the bad side of the world’s most cursed game of truth or dare.

One of those students is a young man by the name of Brad Chang, and he just happens to be gay. That’s right! Not only is he gay, but he’s also Asian! I’m checking off boxes already!

Things start off pretty great, actually. Brad’s out; his friends are supportive. He’s just one of the gang. In fact, the only person who doesn’t know about Brad is his police officer dad.

Now, this whole game is all about exposing your deepest, darkest secrets, so naturally, before this is all over, Brad finds himself having to out himself to his dad, which he does off screen. I watched with relief as Brad comes back and tells his friends that his dad took the news well.

They almost had me.

Brad gets a new dare: Take your father’s sidearm and force him to beg for his life.

Naturally, we had to take what is honestly one of the hardest things we do as queer people and heighten it, and the writers felt like we needed to dig into that wound all over again.

There’s no way that father and son had time to emotionally process what Brad coming out meant to them. We know this because as Brad holds his father at gunpoint, his father tells him, “I’m sorry for how hard I’ve been on you. I guess you think I deserve this.”

What else was he going to think when his son who just came out to him pulls a gun on him? Before anything can be resolved, Brad is shot down by another officer.

I hear you saying, so many people are dying in this movie. Why does this one matter?

It matters because his death was inherently tied up in his sexuality. It matters because he was the only queer character in the film, and it matters for one more reason, which is tied up in the rules of the game.

You see if you were dared you had to do the dare. If you chose truth, you had to tell the whole truth. Failing to follow through brings death. Everyone else who did this survived. Every single one. Not Brad.

Brad died while doing what he was supposed to be doing, and while you might think it’s nitpicking the film’s logic, for most of us in the queer community or any other marginalized group, there is a ringing truth here.

We can do everything that is asked of us. We can follow the rules just like those outside the community, and it still isn’t good enough to appease those that don’t want us seen at all.

In a recent interview with queer filmmaker named Sam Wineman which we posted yesterday, he told me this, “People ask all the time when it’s okay to kill queer characters in horror films. I feel like the answer is when we start letting them live.”

I know I’ve spent a lot of time on this particular film. Some of you probably stopped reading long ago, but for those who have stuck it out, this is just one recent example of tokenism. I’m sure, if you put your mind to it, you could come up with others. Go back up and read that definition from earlier.

Now think on this:

How many times have you seen the fetishized lesbian who serves no purpose beyond titillating the male demographic and adding to the body count?

How many times have you seen the over-the-top gay man who checks off every single stereotype box you can think of and dies because he doesn’t know how to fight?

How many times have you seen a queer character was was introduced into the film and died less than ten minutes later?

Now go back, put the shoe on the other foot, and imagine if everything I listed here was about you.

Part two of this three part series of articles will be coming in a couple of days. Until then, stay scary and Happy Pride!

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Russell Crowe To Star in Another Exorcism Movie & It’s Not a Sequel

Published

on

Maybe it’s because The Exorcist just celebrated its 50th-anniversary last year, or maybe it’s because aging Academy Award-winning actors aren’t too proud to take on obscure roles, but Russell Crowe is visiting the Devil once again in yet another possession film. And it’s not related to his last one, The Pope’s Exorcist.

According to Collider, the film titled The Exorcism was originally going to be released under the name The Georgetown Project. Rights for its North American release were once in the hands of Miramax but then went to Vertical Entertainment. It will release on June 7 in theaters then head over to Shudder for subscribers.

Crowe will also star in this year’s upcoming Kraven the Hunter which is set to drop in theaters on August 30.

As for The Exorcism, Collider provides us with what it’s about:

“The film centers around actor Anthony Miller (Crowe), whose troubles come to the forefront as he shoots a supernatural horror movie. His estranged daughter (Ryan Simpkins) has to figure out whether he’s lapsing into his past addictions, or if something even more horrific is occurring. “

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

Movies

New F-Bomb Laden ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Trailer: Bloody Buddy Movie

Published

on

Deadpool & Wolverine might be the buddy movie of the decade. The two heterodox superheroes are back in the latest trailer for the summer blockbuster, this time with more f-bombs than a gangster film.

‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Movie Trailer

This time the focus is on Wolverine played by Hugh Jackman. The adamantium-infused X-Man is having a bit of a pity party when Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) arrives on the scene who then tries to convince him to team up for selfish reasons. The result is a profanity-filled trailer with a Strange surprise at the end.

Deadpool & Wolverine is one of the most anticipated movies of the year. It comes out on July 26. Here is the latest trailer, and we suggest if you are at work and your space isn’t private, you might want to put in headphones.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

News

Original Blair Witch Cast Ask Lionsgate for Retroactive Residuals in Light of New Film

Published

on

The Blair Witch Project Cast

Jason Blum is planning to reboot The Blair Witch Project for the second time. That’s a fairly large task considering none of the reboots or sequels have managed to capture the magic of the 1999 film that brought found footage into the mainstream.

This idea has not been lost on the original Blair Witch cast, who has recently reached out to Lionsgate to ask for what they feel is fair compensation for their role in the pivotal film. Lionsgate gained access to The Blair Witch Project in 2003 when they purchased Artisan Entertainment.

Blair witch
The Blair Witch Project Cast

However, Artisan Entertainment was an independent studio before its purchase, meaning the actors were not part of SAG-AFTRA. As a result, the cast are not entitled to the same residuals from the project as actors in other major films. The cast doesn’t feel that the studio should be able to continue to profit off of their hard work and likenesses without fair compensation.

Their most recent request asks for “meaningful consultation on any future ‘Blair Witch’ reboot, sequel, prequel, toy, game, ride, escape room, etc., in which one could reasonably assume that Heather, Michael & Josh’s names and/or likenesses will be associated for promotional purposes in the public sphere.”

The blair witch project

At this time, Lionsgate has not offered any comment about this issue.

The full statement made by the cast can be found below.

OUR ASKS OF LIONSGATE (From Heather, Michael & Josh, stars of “The Blair Witch Project”):

1. Retroactive + future residual payments to Heather, Michael and Josh for acting services rendered in the original BWP, equivalent to the sum that would’ve been allotted through SAG-AFTRA, had we had proper union or legal representation when the film was made.

2. Meaningful consultation on any future Blair Witch reboot, sequel, prequel, toy, game, ride, escape room, etc…, in which one could reasonably assume that Heather, Michael & Josh’s names and/or likenesses will be associated for promotional purposes in the public sphere.

Note: Our film has now been rebooted twice, both times were a disappointment from a fan/box office/critical perspective. Neither of these films were made with significant creative input from the original team. As the insiders who created the Blair Witch and have been listening to what fans love & want for 25 years, we’re your single greatest, yet thus-far un-utilized secret-weapon!

3. “The Blair Witch Grant”: A 60k grant (the budget of our original movie), paid out yearly by Lionsgate, to an unknown/aspiring genre filmmaker to assist in making theirfirst feature film. This is a GRANT, not a development fund, hence Lionsgate will not own any of the underlying rights to the project.

A PUBLIC STATEMENT FROM THE DIRECTORS & PRODUCERS OF “THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT”:

As we near the 25th anniversary of The Blair Witch Project, our pride in the storyworld we created and the film we produced is reaffirmed by the recent announcement of a reboot by horror icons Jason Blum and James Wan.

While we, the original filmmakers, respect Lionsgate’s right to monetize the intellectual property as it sees fit, we must highlight the significant contributions of the original cast — Heather Donahue, Joshua Leonard, and Mike Williams. As the literal faces of what has become a franchise, their likenesses, voices, and real names are inseparably tied to The Blair Witch Project. Their unique contributions not only defined the film’s authenticity but continue to resonate with audiences around the world.

We celebrate our film’s legacy, and equally, we believe the actors deserve to be celebrated for their enduring association with the franchise.

Sincerely, Eduardo Sanchez, Dan Myrick, Gregg Hale, Robin Cowie, and Michael Monello

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading