Connect with us

News

Horror Pride Month: Writer/Director Chris Peckover

Published

on

Chris Peckover Horror Pride Month

For out gay writer and director Chris Peckover, his relationship with horror began with a bit of unintentional trauma as a child. The man behind 2016’s Better Watch Out recalls his mom and dad going out to dinner and leaving him home with his younger brother without a sitter.

“My mom rentedĀ Child’s Play for us thinking it was a kid’s movie,” he explained, laughing, during our recent interview. “They went out to dinner, and we watched the movie and I was afraid of the dark until I was in the seventh grade!”

He wasn’t one of those people who loved being scared. Rather, he approached horror as a way of facing the fears that the movies brought out in him.

It was a few years later, when he was around 13 years old, that he saw the film that would inspire him toĀ makeĀ horror movies. That film was Poltergeist, and specifically the scene where the lights came floating down the staircase late at night.

As one moved through JoBeth Williams, she burst into tears saying that her daughter had moved through her soul. The entire family gathered around her and it was a genuinely moving moment for Peckover.

“I remember seeing it and tears streaming down my face and I was a bit confused,” he said. “I was just deathly afraid of a clown like minutes before that and now I’m crying! What was going on here?”

The moment stuck with him, and he began his journey to filmmaking that day noting that it was that mixture of emotions that really spoke to him.

“Jump scares are fine as a tool; gore is fine as a tool,” he explained, “but what I love about horror is the vulnerability. Horror is a communal experience for me. When I walk out of the theater after a great horror film, I feel like we, the audience, have survived something together. That’s what inspires me.”

Chris Peckover Better Watch Out

Peckover carried that inspiration with him, eventually making his first feature, 2010’sĀ Undocumented. The film was a learning experience for him, but one of his biggest takeaways surprised him.

“It was way more graphic thanĀ Better Watch Out,” Peckover pointed out. “I learned with that film that you can’t please gorehounds. They will never get enough. I thought I wanted to chase that, but I think I’ve decided they should just watchĀ Faces of Death on repeat.”

A couple of years later, he was approached by Zack Kahn with a script forĀ Better Watch Out, and he saw an opportunity to make something different that could incorporate some of those lessons he’d learned along the way.

He liked Kahn’s story, but he wanted to shift its tone.

“I thought Zack had written a million dollar twist” the director said. “We talked about where it could go, and I kept thinking about Home Alone. I was a big fan of that film, and I was really in the mood for a good Christmas-themed horror-comedy.”

With that in mind, he set out to rework the script, lightening up some of the hardcore elements of Kahn’s version and concentrating on making the tone a bit more fun in the process.

Before long, they were elbows deep in casting, and Peckover admits he struck gold with his entire cast.

“I read about 200 twelve year olds for the role of Luke,” he explained. “I call that role a ‘motherfucker’ role because it’s really a wide spectrum for someone that age to be able to pull off. It was easy for all of them to get the meanness or the comedy or the cleverness or the warmth that the role needed, but it was nearly impossible to find one that could doĀ all of those things.”

Eventually, however, he met with the Levi Miller who not only knocked the audition out of the park, but also made Peckover take a step back in the process.

“Levi added a sexuality to the character that I had not written into it, really,” he pointed out. “He has a background in modeling and he was exposed to that kind of thing earlier in life. He would pout his lips and he had this almost snake-like way of moving. He was doing things in that audition that creeped me out so much that I ended up adding them to the movie.”

Everything fell into place with Miller on board, and the film has been a success online with distribution on various streaming services. Still, Peckover feels a little bit of guilt about one particular bit of character development that he did not include.

“With the best friend character inĀ Better Watch Out played by Ed Oxenbould,” he explained. “Even while I was writing it, I had in mind that he was in the closet. It was why he followed along with everything that Levi’s character does in the film. There was more there, for him, than just friendship, but I feel like it’s a copout to say that now. I feel a bit like J.K. Rowling saying of course there was a gay character in the film…I just never said it.”

Peckover never even discussed that particular character point with Oxenbould during filming, and it’s something that the regrets while admitting he’s still trying to figure out how to walk that line and make that statement.

“I kept wondering what would be my first film where I actually stare the gay identity in the face and actually say something about it,” he said. “Up until now, I wasn’t entirely sure what I wanted to say so I’ve danced around the issue. I’m happy, now, to say that I think I’ve finally cracked it, and I’m finally developing a film where the two main characters will be gay.”

On the set of Better Watch Out

He calls the project hisĀ gayĀ Get Out, and he says he admires what Jordan Peele was able to do with that film. He also says that the story doesn’t come from the place a lot of filmmakers are trying to place it, specifically in gay conversion therapy camps.

That’s too on the nose for Peckover, and he says that type of premise would have killed Peele’s film, as well.

“If Peele had writtenĀ Get Out and had the character saying, ‘I don’t know if I want to meet your family because they’re conservatives in southern Missouri and they have pitchforks’ it would have beenĀ way to obvious,” Peckover pointed out. “Instead of putting his character in an obvious racist setting, he instead went for the heart of that wheedling, insidious type of racism who insist that they are not actually racist. That’s what is scary!”

“It’s the same thing with what I’m trying to do with this new project,” he continued. “I’m sad and angry that conversion therapy camps exist, but I’m not afraid of them. Real fear comes from that place that we know exists but we can’t quite put our finger on where it’s coming from.”

As he continues working on writing the film, he knows that, much likeĀ Get OutĀ and other films of its ilk, there will be push-back from “horror fans.”

“People still insistĀ Get Out wasn’t a horror movie, and I’m like yeah it is,” he said. “They say the same thing aboutĀ Silence of the Lambs. They try to write them off as psychological thrillers and put distance between themselves and those movies. Good horror is still good horror and those movies are horror movies.”

That tactic, oddly enough has been used on both sides of the aisle. Non-horror fans, and especially critics it seems, want to label those films as something other than horror so they keep their supposed “credibility” while more traditional horror fans have done the same and oddly for the same reason.

For my part, I agree with Peckover, and as we finished up our conversation, I couldn’t help but ask if he’d experienced any trepidation in the possibility of being labeled a “gay filmmaker.”

“I’m gay and I’m a filmmaker, but I think the only time that label really gets thrown at you is when you make bad gay movies,” he said. “If you make something incredible, no one is going to care if you’re gay. Either way, I’m at the place in my life where I’d wear that mantle with pride.”

If you haven’t seenĀ Better Watch Out, it’s currently available on Shudder as part of its Queer Horror collection for Pride month, and keep your eyes peeled for Chris Peckover and his future projects.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Russell Crowe To Star in Another Exorcism Movie & It’s Not a Sequel

Published

on

Maybe it’s because The Exorcist just celebrated its 50th-anniversary last year, or maybe it’s because aging Academy Award-winning actors aren’t too proud to take on obscure roles, but Russell Crowe is visiting the Devil once again in yet another possession film. And it’s not related to his last one, The Pope’s Exorcist.

According to Collider, the film titled The Exorcism was originally going to be released under the name The Georgetown Project. Rights for its North American release were once in the hands of Miramax but then went to Vertical Entertainment. It will release on June 7 in theaters then head over to Shudder for subscribers.

Crowe will also star in this year’s upcoming Kraven the Hunter which is set to drop in theaters on August 30.

As for The Exorcism, Collider provides us with what it’s about:

“The film centers around actor Anthony Miller (Crowe), whose troubles come to the forefront as he shoots a supernatural horror movie. His estranged daughter (Ryan Simpkins) has to figure out whether he’s lapsing into his past addictions, or if something even more horrific is occurring. “

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

Movies

New F-Bomb Laden ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Trailer: Bloody Buddy Movie

Published

on

Deadpool & Wolverine might be the buddy movie of the decade. The two heterodox superheroes are back in the latest trailer for the summer blockbuster, this time with more f-bombs than a gangster film.

‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Movie Trailer

This time the focus is on Wolverine played by Hugh Jackman. The adamantium-infused X-Man is having a bit of a pity party when Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) arrives on the scene who then tries to convince him to team up for selfish reasons. The result is a profanity-filled trailer with a Strange surprise at the end.

Deadpool & Wolverine is one of the most anticipated movies of the year. It comes out on July 26. Here is the latest trailer, and we suggest if you are at work and your space isn’t private, you might want to put in headphones.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

News

Original Blair Witch Cast Ask Lionsgate for Retroactive Residuals in Light of New Film

Published

on

The Blair Witch Project Cast

Jason Blum is planning to reboot The Blair Witch Project for the second time. That’s a fairly large task considering none of the reboots or sequels have managed to capture the magic of the 1999 film that brought found footage into the mainstream.

This idea has not been lost on the original Blair Witch cast, who has recently reached out to Lionsgate to ask for what they feel is fair compensation for their role in the pivotal film. Lionsgate gained access to The Blair Witch Project in 2003 when they purchased Artisan Entertainment.

Blair witch
The Blair Witch Project Cast

However, Artisan Entertainment was an independent studio before its purchase, meaning the actors were not part of SAG-AFTRA. As a result, the cast are not entitled to the same residuals from the project as actors in other major films. The cast doesn’t feel that the studio should be able to continue to profit off of their hard work and likenesses without fair compensation.

Their most recent request asks for ā€œmeaningful consultation on any future ā€˜Blair Witchā€™ reboot, sequel, prequel, toy, game, ride, escape room, etc., in which one could reasonably assume that Heather, Michael & Joshā€™s names and/or likenesses will be associated for promotional purposes in the public sphere.ā€

The blair witch project

At this time, Lionsgate has not offered any comment about this issue.

The full statement made by the cast can be found below.

OUR ASKS OF LIONSGATE (From Heather, Michael & Josh, stars of ā€œThe Blair Witch Projectā€):

1. Retroactive + future residual payments to Heather, Michael and Josh for acting services rendered in the original BWP, equivalent to the sum that wouldā€™ve been allotted through SAG-AFTRA, had we had proper union or legal representation when the film was made.

2. Meaningful consultation on any future Blair Witch reboot, sequel, prequel, toy, game, ride, escape room, etcā€¦, in which one could reasonably assume that Heather, Michael & Joshā€™s names and/or likenesses will be associated for promotional purposes in the public sphere.

Note: Our film has now been rebooted twice, both times were a disappointment from a fan/box office/critical perspective. Neither of these films were made with significant creative input from the original team. As the insiders who created the Blair Witch and have been listening to what fans love & want for 25 years, weā€™re your single greatest, yet thus-far un-utilized secret-weapon!

3. ā€œThe Blair Witch Grantā€: A 60k grant (the budget of our original movie), paid out yearly by Lionsgate, to an unknown/aspiring genre filmmaker to assist in making theirfirst feature film. This is a GRANT, not a development fund, hence Lionsgate will not own any of the underlying rights to the project.

A PUBLIC STATEMENT FROM THE DIRECTORS & PRODUCERS OF ā€œTHE BLAIR WITCH PROJECTā€:

As we near the 25th anniversary of The Blair Witch Project, our pride in the storyworld we created and the film we produced is reaffirmed by the recent announcement of a reboot by horror icons Jason Blum and James Wan.

While we, the original filmmakers, respect Lionsgateā€™s right to monetize the intellectual property as it sees fit, we must highlight the significant contributions of the original cast ā€” Heather Donahue, Joshua Leonard, and Mike Williams. As the literal faces of what has become a franchise, their likenesses, voices, and real names are inseparably tied to The Blair Witch Project. Their unique contributions not only defined the filmā€™s authenticity but continue to resonate with audiences around the world.

We celebrate our filmā€™s legacy, and equally, we believe the actors deserve to be celebrated for their enduring association with the franchise.

Sincerely, Eduardo Sanchez, Dan Myrick, Gregg Hale, Robin Cowie, and Michael Monello

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading