Connect with us

News

(Author Interview) Bram Stoker-nominated author, Ronald Malfi, sits down with iHorror to Talk Little Girls and More

Published

on

Little Girls small

“…she expected her old home to look different–empty, perhaps, like the molted skin of a reptile left behind in the dirt, as if the house had nothing left to do but wither and die…” – from Little Girls

Last month, award-winning horror author, Ronald Malfi, released his latest novel, Little Girls. (Click HERE if you missed my review) One of the best writers going, Malfi’s power is in his ability to craft creepy stories with eerily delicious descriptions like the one above. I’ve been a fan of this man since reading his first excellent creep-fest, Snow back in the Leisure Book Horror days. He blew me away with the follow-up, Floating Staircase, and has continued to leave me in awe ever since. Little Girls is an excellent addition to Malfi’s body of work.

This week, I got a chance to chat with Mr. Malfi. He shares his influences, his experience, his love of paper books over the electronic landslide, his advice to young writers out there, and much, much more.

Malfi headshot

Glenn Rolfe: Hey Ronald, you know I dig your work. Thanks for taking the time to do this.

Ronald Malfi: No problem, buddy. Thanks for having me.

GR: How old were you when you got bit by the writing bug? Did you get started right off?

RM: I was probably around 10 or 11 years old when I started writing seriously. By “seriously,” I mean with discipline and regularity. I’d gotten my hands on an old manual Olympia typewriter and would write several pages every day, usually when I came home from school. These early efforts were just as badly written as you might expect, but I loved writing and I recall specific milestones from back then—hitting my first ten-page story, or writing something that exceeded 100 pages which, for a kid my age, was quite a feat—with great fondness and a sense of achievement, even now. Once I was bitten by the bug, I knew I wanted to do it for a living, and never wavered in that determination.

GR: Give me two books that had an early influence/made a large impact on you.

RM: As with most horror writers of my generation, I’ll cite two Stephen King titles—The Eyes of the Dragon, which was the first King book (and possibly the first adult novel) I read as a kid, and then sometime later, King’s It. I remember some kids at school talking about the book, and particularly the controversial sex scene in the book. We were in middle school, so what is that? Eleven years old? So I made it a point to hunt down a copy of the book and search out that controversial scene. Yet when I started reading the book, I was completely shaken by its grandeur and magnificence and forgot all about the scene for which I’d originally gotten a copy of the book. I was roughly the same age as the kids in that novel and it had such a profound effect on me. I’ve still got that original paperback, although it’s tattered to hell and split into two halves. I’ve read it maybe three or four times. A wonderful novel of childhood fears and innocence lost.

GR: Give me two recent works that had a similar impact.

RM: Two books that jump to mind are Girl Imagined by Chance by Lance Olsen and Glen Hirshberg’s The Snowman’s Children. Though neither are exactly “recent,” both of those books are transcendent and highly recommended.

6969112

GR: Most of us going right now in the horror biz were huge Leisure Book fans. You released Snow with them. What was the experience like for you?

RM: I’ve got an entire bookshelf dedicated to those old Leisure paperbacks, and it still rankles me to think about what happened there. Without getting into the gritty details of the bankruptcy, I’ll say that I was ecstatic to sign with Leisure and Editor Don D’Auria back in…I guess around 2008 or so. Don initially signed me for one novel, Snow, which did pretty well for them. It was in all the bookstores and garnered me an audience much more expansive than I’d had in the past. If nothing else, I’ll credit Leisure and Don D’Auria for introducing my work to a much wider readership than I could have on my own. I was in New York City for, I think, BookExpo that year—this would have been early 2009, now that I think about it, because I was there to promote Shamrock Alley—and I met Don for some drinks and we went to his office. Man, it was just what you wanted his office to look like, with manuscripts stacked in towers on every available surface, wedged behind the office door, shoved under desks and bookcases. I had stars in my eyes, man. Don offered me free books—I could have probably gone away with 20 paperbacks, but I didn’t want to seem greedy, so I took only a copy of Wrath James White’s The Resurrectionist and Jeff Strand’s Pressure. It was a great trip and Don was a wonderful guy. Before Snow had hit stores (I recall) Don sent me a contract for two additional novels. These were Floating Staircase and Cradle Lake. However, before those contracts were submitted, I could smell smoke on the horizon and started asking questions about my late payments for Snow. In short, I never submitted the contract for Floating Staircase and Cradle Lake, and was able to take them over to my then-current publisher, Medallion Press, who did a magnificent job with those titles. I was also about to get back the rights to Snow, which was ultimately reprinted with Delirium Books and remains in print with Darkfuse. The Leisure book club was a great way to get newer authors into the mainstream and its demise is more than just unfortunate—it’s tragic.

GR: You write a damn good ghost story (The Mourning House, Floating Staircase), but you’re not stuck in that sub-genre. You’ve done aliens, evil plants, Cthulu, and the horror in humans. I’m definitely in the same boat. I can’t see the attraction in writing the same thing over and over. What are your reasons in the variances of subjects or monsters?

RM: Probably just what you’ve said—that I’d get bored writing the same thing over and over again. Some authors find a niche writing…I don’t know…vampire or werewolf or zombie fiction…and man, if it works for them, that’s great. But I’d lose interest doing something like that. I can’t even summon the gusto to pen a sequel to any of my books, let alone write in the same genre for six, seven, ten books.

GR: Is there a book you want to write that might surprise your fans?

RM: Readers who know my earlier works might say that I’ve already written those books. My third novel, The Nature of Monsters, was a mainstream novel about a writer who chases his friend, a poet-turned-prizefighter, from a small Kentucky town to Baltimore. Nothing scary about it, except for the sales numbers. Similarly, people who have gone back and read my fourth novel, Via Dolorosa, have commented that it seemed like a different writer had written it. I was writing books on spec back then and not beholden to any contracts, so in a way, I was free to write whatever I wanted. And that’s exactly what I did.

GR: When I read Floating Staircase, it had the same effect on me as Boy’s Life. I had been writing for less than a year and it almost scared me out of even trying. It was that good. Just your intense story, the mystery, the characters, the beautiful descriptions that you utilize without ever over indulging like some authors. Was there ever a book like that to you. One that made you say, “fuck, I can’t do that.”

RM: It’s funny you mention Boy’s Life, as that book was one of the influences on my writing career, and specifically for my novel December Park—which Mr. McCammon was kind enough to provide a blurb. Talk about star-struck! But, sure, I see what you’re saying; I’ve read plenty of books that are just preternatural in their power. I have always been in awe of writers like Hemingway, Thomas Pynchon, Peter Straub, Robert McCammon, Dan Simmons. I was a young teenager when I first read Lolita, and even though I guess some of the nuances were lost on me at the time, I recognized that I was reading something written by a god, and that it was something I’d most likely never be able to compete with. And I think that’s the trick—you can’t try to write in order to best your betters. There will always be some book out of your reach, and you’ll just wind up hyper-extending your arm grasping for it. The best books are honest, simple books, written in your true voice and telling stories you’re passionate about. That’s it, really. That’s the secret.

GR: Which of your books holds a special place in your heart and why?

RM: Floating Staircase and December Park, both of which hold some very strong autobiographical elements. They were also the two books where the final product was pretty close to how I originally envisioned them in my head. Usually books change form midway through the writing process—a casualty of writing without an outline or notes—but those two pretty much stayed on course, at least as far as the overall tone and feel of the books, if not for the particular plot-points within.

ronald51E7P+czpqL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_

GR: What are some of your favorite films? Horror or otherwise.

RM: Raiders of the Lost Ark; Back to the Future; Gremlins; Jaws; Close Encounters of the Third Kind; Fight Club; The Big Lebowski; Star Wars.

GR: Excellent choices!  What’s one of your favorite things to do outside of the writing life?

RM: Spending time with my family.

GR: You’re a big proponent of not getting complacent. You’ve told writers to reach higher. How does a young writer know when they’re ready to reach for that next level?

RM: A lot of newer writers who are published through the small press for, say, their inaugural novel come away as if they’d been hit by a bus. They’re shocked at the pitiable royalty statements, the lack of respect they’re getting throughout the rest of the industry, the lack of interest from booksellers who really have no interest in having you hold a book signing in their stores. This is the reality for some of those writers, and I think my recommendation to those writers is to not try to talk up your achievements (and your publisher, who’s really doing nothing to promote you) and pretend you’re bigger than you are, but to hone your skills, find the right people with whom you should be speaking, and ultimately put yourself in the place you were previously pretending to be. Does that make sense? 

GR: Do you advise getting an agent? If you have or had one, what was your experience with one like?

RM: It’s that old chestnut, isn’t it? A bad agent is worse than having no agent at all, but you generally can’t get a good agent until you don’t need one. I currently have an agent, and she was instrumental in landing my current book deal with Kensington. We had a similar game plan for my latest book, Little Girls, and we were always on the same page as each other—no pun intended. She’s also a wonderful sounding board when I begin to question my manuscripts, which I do often. These are invaluable qualities in an agent. Unless you’re happy in the small or indie presses—or if you prefer to self-publish—you’ll eventually need an agent to land a deal with a bigger publishing house. That’s been my experience, anyway. I’d recommend finding out who reps the authors you enjoy reading at a particular publishing company and contacting them. Send them your best, most cleanly edited work, and don’t be an unprofessional asshole about it. If your work is good, someone will want to rep it.

GR: Worst and best experience in your writing life so far.

RM: Things are mostly good with the writing these days. I’ve worked very hard to get to where I am, and after 13 novels, a handful of novellas, and uncountable published short fiction, I’m very happy with what I’ve achieved. I write what I want to write and don’t compromise. I’ve had some wonderful experiences being invited to speak at conferences around the country, meeting wonderful fans and talking with writing groups, speaking with students at all levels, and just being able to write and converse with my readers about my fiction. All of those are wonderful things. Perhaps the lowest period is when I find myself in a funk, suffering a bit of writer’s block, I guess. That’s when I start growing envious of those guys who write nothing but vampire fiction, because I think maybe I could just switch to autopilot and pump out another book if that were the case. But I try to do something different with each new book, and it’s taxing. Not to mention that I’ve got two very young children who also take up much of my time. Nonetheless, I’ve been publishing one novel a year for the past several years now, and plan to continue doing so.

GR: I know you’re not an eBook guy. What gives? Could you ever be swayed?

RM: I’ve got nothing against e-books. Personally, I prefer to hold a book in my hands. I’m extremely obsessive-compulsive about the specific typographical nuances of books, like the font used, the spacing, the margins, the way the pages are cut—these things are just as much a part, or almost as much a part, of reading a book to me as the story. If someone gave you a pill that would fill you up for the day and you’d never have to waste time eating a meal, would you take the pill? Or do you enjoy the taste of steak and pizza and french fries too much? To me, that’s the difference.

GR: Barker, Straub, King, McCammon—Which of these are your favorite?

RM: Christ, how can I answer? King is king. Hands down. But Straub and McCammon have such a beauty to their words. Straub in particular always leaves me wondering what brilliance I have missed between the lines of text, for he writes like someone burying artifacts in the sand. You’ll never find all those artifacts, but you may find enough to put the puzzle together. I was never a really huge Barker fan, though I’ve always enjoyed all his books. Books of Blood were great fun, and I’ve always been partial to his novel Sacrament, which many of his fans tend to overlook.

GR: Name a few books by these guys that you consider under-appreciated.

RM: Well, Sacrament by Barker, as I’ve mentioned. As for McCammon, I’m still astounded by the number of people who haven’t read Boy’s Life. It’s truly a classic, quite possibly the seminal coming-of-age genre novel. Is King under-appreciated at all? I’ll admit a fondness for Eyes of the Dragon, since that was the first King I’d read as a child and it holds a special place in my heart. Not many have read it. Would a Bachman novel count? I’ve always thought The Long Walk was brilliant. And lastly, I think pretty much everything Peter Straub has written is under-appreciated. His novel Julia was a big influence on my latest, Little Girls. His novel The Throat is a staggering achievement which, on its surface, comes across like a post-noir detective novel, but it’s really something much bigger and hungrier than that. I’ve reread The Throat countless times. Many people love Ghost Story, as do I, but The Throat is Peter Straub in all his full Straubiness.

straub_throatthe-long-walkbl_20_pb

GR: Lastly, would you ever co-write a novel or novella with another author? Maybe someone from Maine?  

RM: Ha! No subtlety there, huh? I’ve kicked around the idea of collaborating with a few other authors in the past, but to be honest, for me, writing a book is such a personal, haunting, grueling, individual endeavor, I have no idea how I’d go about sharing such brutality with another human being.

GR: Thanks for your time, Ronald. I appreciate it.

RM: Any time, Glenn.  Thanks for having me.

 

Little Girls, Information and Synopsis

 

  • File Size:1769 KB
  • Print Length:384 pages
  • Publisher:Kensington (June 30, 2015)
  • Publication Date:June 30, 2015

 

From Bram Stoker Award nominee Ronald Malfi comes a brilliantly chilling novel of childhood revisited, memories resurrected, and fears reborn…

 

When Laurie was a little girl, she was forbidden to enter the room at the top of the stairs. It was one of many rules imposed by her cold, distant father. Now, in a final act of desperation, her father has exorcised his demons. But when Laurie returns to claim the estate with her husband and ten-year-old daughter, it’s as if the past refuses to die. She feels it lurking in the broken moldings, sees it staring from an empty picture frame, and hears it laughing in the moldy greenhouse deep in the woods…

 

At first, Laurie thinks she’s imagining things. But when she meets her daughter’s new playmate, Abigail, she can’t help but notice her uncanny resemblance to another little girl who used to live next door. Who died next door. With each passing day, Laurie’s uneasiness grows stronger, her thoughts more disturbing. Like her father, is she slowly losing her mind? Or is something truly unspeakable happening to those sweet little girls?

 

Praise for Ronald Malfi and his novels

“One cannot help but think of writers like Peter Straub and Stephen King.”
—FearNet

“Malfi is a skillful storyteller.”—New York Journal of Books

“A complex and chilling tale….terrifying.”—Robert McCammon

“Malfi’s lyrical prose creates an atmosphere of eerie claustrophobia…haunting.”—Publishers Weekly

“A thrilling, edge-of-your-seat ride that should not be missed.”—Suspense Magazine

Links to Pre-Order or Purchase

Amazon:

https://www.amazon.com/Little-Girls-Ronald-Malfi/dp/1617736066

Barnes and Noble:

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/little-girls-ronald-malfi/1120137979?ean=9781617736063

Or pick up or ask to order at your local independent bookstore or anywhere e-formats are sold!

 

Ronald Malfi, Biography

Ronald Malfi is an award-winning author of many novels and novellas in the horror, mystery, and thriller categories from various publishers, including Little Girls, this summer’s 2015 release from Kensington.

In 2009, his crime drama, Shamrock Alley, won a Silver IPPY Award. In 2011, his ghost story/mystery novel, Floating Staircase, was a finalist for the Horror Writers Association Bram Stoker Award for best novel, a Gold IPPY Award for best horror novel, and the Vincent Preis International Horror Award. His novel Cradle Lake garnered him the Benjamin Franklin Independent Book Award (silver) in 2014. December Park, his epic childhood story, won the Beverly Hills International Book Award for suspense in 2015.

Most recognized for his haunting, literary style and memorable characters, Malfi’s dark fiction has gained acceptance among readers of all genres.
He was born in Brooklyn, New York in 1977, and eventually relocated to the Chesapeake Bay area, where he currently resides with his wife and two children.

Visit with Ronald Malfi on Facebook, Twitter (@RonaldMalfi), or at www.ronmalfi.com.

Giveaway

Sign up to win one of two paperback copies of Little Girls by Ronald Malfi by clicking the link to the Rafflecopter link below. Be sure to follow the specifics you can do each day to gain more entries.

https://www.rafflecopter.com/rafl/share-code/MjMxYWEzMGI1ZDE2MGYyYTgzYjk4NzVhYzhmMTdmOjE4/?

 

 

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Russell Crowe To Star in Another Exorcism Movie & It’s Not a Sequel

Published

on

Maybe it’s because The Exorcist just celebrated its 50th-anniversary last year, or maybe it’s because aging Academy Award-winning actors aren’t too proud to take on obscure roles, but Russell Crowe is visiting the Devil once again in yet another possession film. And it’s not related to his last one, The Pope’s Exorcist.

According to Collider, the film titled The Exorcism was originally going to be released under the name The Georgetown Project. Rights for its North American release were once in the hands of Miramax but then went to Vertical Entertainment. It will release on June 7 in theaters then head over to Shudder for subscribers.

Crowe will also star in this year’s upcoming Kraven the Hunter which is set to drop in theaters on August 30.

As for The Exorcism, Collider provides us with what it’s about:

“The film centers around actor Anthony Miller (Crowe), whose troubles come to the forefront as he shoots a supernatural horror movie. His estranged daughter (Ryan Simpkins) has to figure out whether he’s lapsing into his past addictions, or if something even more horrific is occurring. “

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

Movies

New F-Bomb Laden ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Trailer: Bloody Buddy Movie

Published

on

Deadpool & Wolverine might be the buddy movie of the decade. The two heterodox superheroes are back in the latest trailer for the summer blockbuster, this time with more f-bombs than a gangster film.

‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Movie Trailer

This time the focus is on Wolverine played by Hugh Jackman. The adamantium-infused X-Man is having a bit of a pity party when Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) arrives on the scene who then tries to convince him to team up for selfish reasons. The result is a profanity-filled trailer with a Strange surprise at the end.

Deadpool & Wolverine is one of the most anticipated movies of the year. It comes out on July 26. Here is the latest trailer, and we suggest if you are at work and your space isn’t private, you might want to put in headphones.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

News

Original Blair Witch Cast Ask Lionsgate for Retroactive Residuals in Light of New Film

Published

on

The Blair Witch Project Cast

Jason Blum is planning to reboot The Blair Witch Project for the second time. That’s a fairly large task considering none of the reboots or sequels have managed to capture the magic of the 1999 film that brought found footage into the mainstream.

This idea has not been lost on the original Blair Witch cast, who has recently reached out to Lionsgate to ask for what they feel is fair compensation for their role in the pivotal film. Lionsgate gained access to The Blair Witch Project in 2003 when they purchased Artisan Entertainment.

Blair witch
The Blair Witch Project Cast

However, Artisan Entertainment was an independent studio before its purchase, meaning the actors were not part of SAG-AFTRA. As a result, the cast are not entitled to the same residuals from the project as actors in other major films. The cast doesn’t feel that the studio should be able to continue to profit off of their hard work and likenesses without fair compensation.

Their most recent request asks for “meaningful consultation on any future ‘Blair Witch’ reboot, sequel, prequel, toy, game, ride, escape room, etc., in which one could reasonably assume that Heather, Michael & Josh’s names and/or likenesses will be associated for promotional purposes in the public sphere.”

The blair witch project

At this time, Lionsgate has not offered any comment about this issue.

The full statement made by the cast can be found below.

OUR ASKS OF LIONSGATE (From Heather, Michael & Josh, stars of “The Blair Witch Project”):

1. Retroactive + future residual payments to Heather, Michael and Josh for acting services rendered in the original BWP, equivalent to the sum that would’ve been allotted through SAG-AFTRA, had we had proper union or legal representation when the film was made.

2. Meaningful consultation on any future Blair Witch reboot, sequel, prequel, toy, game, ride, escape room, etc…, in which one could reasonably assume that Heather, Michael & Josh’s names and/or likenesses will be associated for promotional purposes in the public sphere.

Note: Our film has now been rebooted twice, both times were a disappointment from a fan/box office/critical perspective. Neither of these films were made with significant creative input from the original team. As the insiders who created the Blair Witch and have been listening to what fans love & want for 25 years, we’re your single greatest, yet thus-far un-utilized secret-weapon!

3. “The Blair Witch Grant”: A 60k grant (the budget of our original movie), paid out yearly by Lionsgate, to an unknown/aspiring genre filmmaker to assist in making theirfirst feature film. This is a GRANT, not a development fund, hence Lionsgate will not own any of the underlying rights to the project.

A PUBLIC STATEMENT FROM THE DIRECTORS & PRODUCERS OF “THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT”:

As we near the 25th anniversary of The Blair Witch Project, our pride in the storyworld we created and the film we produced is reaffirmed by the recent announcement of a reboot by horror icons Jason Blum and James Wan.

While we, the original filmmakers, respect Lionsgate’s right to monetize the intellectual property as it sees fit, we must highlight the significant contributions of the original cast — Heather Donahue, Joshua Leonard, and Mike Williams. As the literal faces of what has become a franchise, their likenesses, voices, and real names are inseparably tied to The Blair Witch Project. Their unique contributions not only defined the film’s authenticity but continue to resonate with audiences around the world.

We celebrate our film’s legacy, and equally, we believe the actors deserve to be celebrated for their enduring association with the franchise.

Sincerely, Eduardo Sanchez, Dan Myrick, Gregg Hale, Robin Cowie, and Michael Monello

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading