Connect with us

News

Late to the Party: Wes Craven’s ‘New Nightmare’ (1994)

Published

on

Late to the Party

Image result for new nightmare

Via Mondo Tees

“Miss me?”

I’m glad I waited this long to finally watch Wes Craven’s New Nightmare. Listening to movie podcasts (specifically those that focus on horror) for the last few years has helped me approach cinema with an analytical edge that I never had before.

I wouldn’t have been able to comprehend a meta-horror film such as this or others, like the Scream franchise (also directed by Craven) or The Cabin in the Woods by Drew Goddard properly.

I had to watch this movie four times within the last month just to be able to process the heavy material.

At least with Scream and others, the characters are aware of horror films as well as the rules or cliches that define them. But, they’re unaware of the fact that their reality is governed by these rules (except for Randy) or that these rules can be twisted and even broken.

In New Nightmare, the characters are the actors (playing themselves) so not only do they have access to the horror genre and the rules–but the rules and the tropes that are unique or specific for their own franchise (A Nightmare on Elm Street) in a world that is basically our own, albeit a little more movie manufactured.

This knowledge grants the characters potential foresight, while in turn dismantling whatever conventions or expectations the audience may have.

It’s essentially Inception, a movie–within a movie

That being said, Scream is arguably the quintessential meta-horror series in cinematic history.

A series that not only: revamped the slasher genre for a new generation and for many generations to come–bringing the sub-genre out of obscurity and into the mainstream (much like Halloween did in 1978), and unwittingly created a horror movement that would carry through the 90’s and well into the millennium.

Strangely enough, New Nightmare predates Scream by two years, but no one ever talks about it or the radical ambition behind this unique feature and the monumental impact it had on the genre.

It stands alone in terms of its concepts and execution. Craven essentially treated this feature as a blank canvas for this experimentation in film making, witnessing firsthand what works and what doesn’t in terms of metafiction.

As a result, by the time Scream came along, Craven and Kevin Williamson were able to nearly perfect the idea.

Neither of these films are the first to go meta–that title probably belongs to Peeping Tom, which is also the first slasher I believe (it’s debatable).

But, without them we wouldn’t have any of the self-aware brilliance that has come along since they first terrorized our feeble minds on the big screen.

Image result for a nightmare on elm street bathtub

Via Metro

The Story for Wes Craven’s New Nightmare

“Reality and fantasy meet in unsettling ways in this installment of the long-running horror series, which finds director Wes Craven and actors Heather Langenkamp and Robert Englund all portraying themselves. As Heather (Heather Langenkamp) considers making another film with Craven, her son, Dylan (Miko Hughes), falls under the spell of the iconic disfigured villain Freddy Krueger (Robert Englund). Eventually, Langenkamp must confront Freddy’s demonic spirit to save the soul of Dylan.”

The Review

New Nightmare is a great film and truly unique, but it’s not perfect by any stretch. Craven appeared to write himself into a corner with his extensive and ambitious concepts.

I had a difficult time discerning Freddy’s abilities in the real world. He could obviously effect his victims in the same way in which he did in previous films (if you die in your dreams, you die for real).

He could also appear when the characters were awake, like in the scene where he comes out of Heather’s closet (an awesome sequence) and slashes her arm.

But he retreats when an earthquake begins to shake the house–this earthquake however, turns out to be isolated to Heather’s house. Where did he go? Does Freddy have limited amount of time while in the real world? It’s safe to assume that he wasn’t frightened by the quake.

Shortly after that scene, her son Dylan is given a shot from a nurse to “help” him sleep. Despite his babysitter Julie’s best efforts to keep him awake, he dozes off for a second and Freddy is able to manifest and brutally murder her.

But, nobody can see him, as if all of this is taking place within a dream (a dream that Julie would have to be in) for this to make sense.

Following Julie’s death, Heather claims that Dylan sleepwalks and can easily leave the hospital on his own accord. Does this mean that as long as he (or any of them) are asleep, Freddy can treat the entire world as his playground with unlimited power?

As brilliant and mind bending as these scenes are, they leave much to be desired in terms of explanation and reason.

Image result for new nightmare

Via Screen Slate

Elm Street Continuity

This is something that I have noticed throughout the Nightmare franchise: directors or screenwriters have a difficult time keeping up with continuity and establishing concrete rules for the dreamworld as well as “reality” and the complex relationship between the two.

I believe the logistics get tossed aside in favor of keeping profound or groundbreaking scenes and effects, or they just simply get lost in the shuffle.

It’s a bit of a catch-22. If hard science was applied, we may not have these iconic scenes from the franchise: Tina getting dragged up the wall and gutted, Freddy’s glove breaking the bathtub water, etc., but they lose a bit of credibility and points with critics due to their lack of continuity or coherence.

To be fair to critics, the glove should have vanished instantly when Nancy woke up instead of retreating below the depths from whence it came.

Related image

Via Filmgrab

Noteworthy Moments

I greatly appreciated Craven’s thought to include a scene with Robert Englund in Freddy’s classic makeup and attire, so that when the real Freddy shows up we can visually discern the major differences between the two different iterations.

The new and improved Freddy is bulkier, with clean and sleek clothing–including a black trench coat, black military boots, and leather pants.

His makeup is significantly different, resembling an anatomy dummy of a human’s muscular structure, his glove has become a part of him and includes a fifth bladed appendage.

I adore his new look, he is very intimidating. Its a shame that the rest of the franchise doesn’t include this variant–maybe in a future remake, reboot, re-imagining or what have you.

Related image

Via Stillcrew

The cameos were a nice touch: Bob Shaye, Wes Craven, Lin Shaye, Robert Englund. They helped ground the audience into the reality.

But they were undermined or undercut by some pretty poor performances and some super cheesy and on-the-nose dialogue.

The ending setting was brilliant, Heather accepts that she is going to play Nancy one last time (the new nightmare film) Freddy’s dream lair was like hell.

A bleak and smoldering cathedral of nihilism, very aesthetically pleasing.

Although I did appreciate the setting, the way that Freddy “dies” is super confusing and I think pretty lazy.

One of the recurring rules throughout this franchise is that Freddy cannot be harmed while in the dreamworld, but in New Nightmare, he gets stabbed and carries a limp, and burns to death (again) in his own world. It just seemed rushed, and pretty unsatisfying.

Image result for new nightmare

Via Horror Geek Life

This movie is definitely worth the watch. It’s criminally underrated as an Elm Street film, a horror film, and as metafiction.

It used to be on Netflix for the longest time, but now you may have to rent it at places like Amazon for three bucks–it’s worth the cost.

'Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire' Popcorn Bucket

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Childhood Memories Collide in New Horror Film ‘Poohniverse: Monsters Assemble’

Published

on

It looks like ITN Studious and Jagged Edge Productions are going the Avengers: Infinity War route with their upcoming film Poohniverse: Monsters Assemble. From the deranged mind of Rhys Frake-Waterfield (Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey) comes this belligerent mash up of beloved childhood icons.

According to an article out of Variety today, Poohniverse: Monsters Assemble will consist of Winnie the Pooh, Bambi, Tinkerbell, Pinocchio, Peter Pan, Tigger, Piglet, The Mad Hatter, and Sleeping Beauty. All of these iconic figured will be warped into nightmarish versions of their former selves. Poohniverse: Monsters Assemble is set to be released upon the world sometime in 2025.

Poohniverse

Actor-producer Scott Chambers (Malevolent) had the following to say about Poohniverse: Monsters Assemble. “As horror fans, we would love an Avengers that is all villains. It’d have Freddy Krueger, Jason, ‘Halloween,’ ‘Scream,’ all of those. Obviously that will never happen, but we can make it happen in our own little way, and that’s where this film has been born.”

Poohniverse: Monsters Assemble will be a part of The Twisted Childhood Universe. Just like the MCU, each character will first get a standalone film. After introductions are made, they will be reunited in an Avengers style film. Although they will be killing off the survivors from the previous films, they won’t be working together.

Chambers describes this as an “epic sequences of monster vs. monster.” And I don’t know what more fans could ask of the studio. This fantastical idea is a huge risk but Poohniverse: Monsters Assemble sounds amazing.

That’s all the information we have at this time. Check back here for more updates on Poohniverse: Monsters Assemble. If you haven’t already, check out the trailer for Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey 2 below.

'Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire' Popcorn Bucket

Continue Reading

News

Blumhouse’s ‘The Wolf Man’ Reboot Kicks Off Production with Leigh Whannell at the Helm

Published

on

Blumhouse Productions has officially commenced filming its reboot of the Universal Monsters legend, “Wolf Man”. Under the direction of Leigh Whannell, known for his acclaimed work on “The Invisible Man” (2020), the project promises to breathe new life into the iconic tale. The film is slated for a theatrical release on October 25th, marking a new chapter in the storied franchise.

Wolf Man

The journey of a “Wolf Man” reboot began in 2020 when actor Ryan Gosling presented a fresh take on the classic story to Universal. This concept quickly evolved into a screenplay crafted by the talented duo Lauren Schuker Blum and Rebecca Angelo, who are known for their work on “Orange Is the New Black,” alongside contributions from Whannell and Corbett Tuck. The narrative is set in contemporary times, drawing inspiration from the atmospheric tension of Jake Gyllenhaal’s “Nightcrawler,” albeit with a distinct supernatural twist.

The film has seen its share of directorial and casting shifts, with Whannell initially signing on to direct in 2020, only to step away and then return to the project after Ryan Gosling and director Derek Cianfrance exited. The lead roles have been filled by Christopher Abbott and Julia Garner, both of whom bring significant talent to the screen. Abbott portrays a man whose family faces the terror of a lethal predator, with Garner likely playing his wife, sharing in the familial peril. The storyline also hints at a daughter named Ginger, adding a layer of depth to the family’s harrowing experience.

Julia Garner and Christopher Abbott

This reboot represents a collaboration between Blumhouse and Motel Movies, with Jason Blum producing. Ryan Gosling remains involved as an executive producer, alongside Ken Kao, Bea Sequeira, Mel Turner, and Whannell himself. The announcement of the film’s production start was made by Jason Blum, who shared an exciting glimpse of Whannell on set, signaling the beginning of what is hoped to be a memorable addition to the horror genre.

As the “Wolf Man” reboot moves forward, fans and newcomers alike are eager to see how this modern interpretation will pay homage to its roots while offering a fresh and thrilling experience. With a talented cast and crew at the helm, the film is poised to reintroduce the timeless tale of transformation and terror to a new generation.

'Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire' Popcorn Bucket

Continue Reading

Games

‘Immaculate’ Stars Reveal Which Horror Villains They Would “F, Marry, Kill”

Published

on

Sydney Sweeney is just coming off the success of her rom-com Anyone But You, but she’s ditching the love story for a horror story in her latest film Immaculate.

Sweeney is taking Hollywood by storm, portraying everything from a love-lusting teenager in Euphoria to an accidental superhero in Madame Web. Although the latter got a lot of hate among theater-goers, Immaculate is getting the polar opposite.

The film was screened at SXSW this past week and was well-received. It also gained a reputation for being extremely gory. Derek Smith of Slant says the, “final act contains some of the most twisted, gory violence this particular subgenre of horror has seen in years…”

Thankfully curious horror movie fans won’t have to wait long to see for themselves what Smith is talking about as Immaculate will hit theaters across the United States on March, 22.

Bloody Disgusting says that the movie’s distributor NEON, in a bit of marketing smarts, had stars Sydney Sweeney and Simona Tabasco play a game of “F, Marry, Kill” in which all their choices had to be horror movie villains.

It’s an interesting question, and you might be surprised at their answers. So colorful are their responses that YouTube slapped an age-restricted rating on the video.

Immaculate is a religious horror movie that NEON says stars Sweeney, “as Cecilia, an American nun of devout faith, embarking on a new journey in a remote convent in the picturesque Italian countryside. Cecilia’s warm welcome quickly devolves into a nightmare as it becomes clear her new home harbors a sinister secret and unspeakable horrors.”

'Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire' Popcorn Bucket

Continue Reading

Horror Movie Reaction Video