Connect with us

News

Late to the Party: ‘Dolls’ (1987)

Published

on

Welcome back to another weekly edition of Late to the Party, the review series that pits iHorror writers against the cult classics and fan favorites we somehow haven’t seen. This week’s film is 1987’s “Dolls,” directed by Stuard Gordon, produced by Charles Band and Brian Yuzna, and written by Ed Naha.

If you’re like me and your earliest memories of horror fandom are from perusing the cover art in your local video rental store, then you probably remember this one:

Late to the Party: Dolls

Empire Pictures

Despite that amazing cover always sticking out to me, I never actually got around to seeing it until now. I’m particularly ashamed since I’m a big Stuart Gordon fan. Sadly, there’s no Jeffrey Combs here. He could’ve done so much with this wacky script, in a number of different roles.

Welcome to the Dollhouse

For a lean 77 minutes, “Dolls” takes a while to get started. It takes place in the English countryside, but we can only be certain it’s in Britain because everyone drives on the left side. The characters seem split between English and American.

We meet young Judy, her father David and her stepmother Rosemary. David and Rosemary just got married, and they’re spending their honeymoon driving through the country in a Rolls-Royce with Judy in tow. Rosemary is your typical evil stepmother, who considers Judy a burden and wants nothing to do with her. What’s a real surprise is that David doesn’t want her there either, and keeps reminding Rosemary that he only has custody of her for the summer. We learn that Rosemary is rich, so I don’t understand why David doesn’t just pay child support and leave Judy with her mother. Then again, this whole movie feels like it’s told from a child’s point of view. More on that later.

One of the best scenes in the film happens early on, when Rosemary throws Judy’s teddy bear, Teddy, into the bushes during a rainstorm. Teddy comes to life and emerges as a giant stuffed bear with actual teeth and claws, and slaughters Rosemary and David. However, that’s revealed to be Judy’s imagination, unfortunately.

They look for a place to hunker down and wait out the storm, and stumble upon a spooky old mansion inhabited by an elderly couple, Gabriel and Hilary, along with a buttload of dolls. They have no children of their own, but Gabriel is a toymaker who makes creepy dolls while Hilary puts the dolls in a baby carriage and walks them around the house in the middle of the night. Charming!

Late to the Party: Dolls

“I’m having a fucking tea party, what does it look like?”
Empire Pictures

The mansion itself does a lot of the heavy lifting for this film: It’s a gorgeous old house that would be at home in any gothic story. Each room has dozens of dolls, and you notice early on that the dolls eyes move.

Ralph, Enid and Isabel storm the party next. Enid and Isabel are two punk girls who are hoping to rob Ralph, and Ralph is an American tourist who’s hoping to score with one or both of them. Ralph also looks like a budget Sean Astin.

The punk girls seem out of place in this setting, even more so than the American characters. I don’t think they gave any explanation as to what they were doing in the middle of nowhere. Then again, no one really does. We see Isabel and Enid briefly hitchhiking in the opening scene. Then Ralph picked them up, and then his car died near the house.

Everyone ends up staying the night, and it’s only at this point that things start to pick up. It took a lot to bring this diverse cast of characters to this place, and that took me out of the movie more than the killer dolls. It reminded me of “Spookies” from the previous year, which had multiple unrelated groups wandering into an old house for various reasons just to add more fodder for the monsters. However, “Spookies” was one movie awkwardly shoehorned into another after the original creators bailed. I don’t think “Dolls” had the same issues to explain all the questions.

Late to the Party: Dolls

This “Little Rascals” remake is awfully dark.
Empire Pictures

The Valley of the Killer Dolls

The real stars of this film are the dolls. The stop-motion animation works well, and the dolls come off as vicious when they attack our human characters. They bite, they stab and some of them even use little toy guns, with lethal results.

I do have some questions about the dolls themselves, and most of their backstory is left to the viewer’s interpretation. When people fight back, some of the dolls are hollow and shatter easily, while others seem to have little skeletons inside them. It’s not entirely clear why some dolls are different, but one character gets turned into a doll as punishment. Are these humanoid dolls the souls of bad people, trapped in this house for eternity? It’s never really fully explained.

I’d almost classify “Dolls” as a dark fairy tale rather than a straight-up horror. It has a dreamlike quality and its own sense of morality. Children and adults who remember their childhood wonder are spared, while cynical adults are brutally murdered. Do the dolls know the difference? Are Gabriel and Hilary, the kindly old toymakers trapping people here in the bodies of dolls? Probably. What else are you going to do in a big old house in the countryside?

Overall, this film is uneven, and it seems to drag in places despite its short runtime. While it has its faults, but it’s still worth watching if you enjoy creepy dolls, Stuart Gordon, Brian Yuzna and dark fantasy. There isn’t a lot of gore, but the few gory scenes are impressive. For a relatively low budget of $2 million, the special effects by John Carl Buechler are impressive.

“Dolls” wasn’t a commercial success, but recently it’s become a cult favorite, thanks in part to a new collector’s edition Blu-ray from Shout! Factory.

Watch the trailer here:

Let us know what you thought of “Dolls.”

Stay tuned next week for more Late to the Party, or check out our past reviews here!

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

‘Happy Death Day 3’ Only Needs Greenlight From Studio

Published

on

Jessica Rothe who is currently starring in the ultra-violent Boy Kills World talked to ScreenGeek at WonderCon and gave them an exclusive update about her franchise Happy Death Day.

The horror time-looper is a popular series that did pretty well at the box office especially the first one which introduced us to the bratty Tree Gelbman (Rothe) who is being stalked by a masked killer. Christopher Landon directed the original and its sequel Happy Death Day 2U.

Happy Death Day 2U

According to Rothe, a third is being proposed, but two major studios need to sign off on the project. Here is what Rothe had to say:

“Well, I can say Chris Landon has the whole thing figured out. We just need to wait for Blumhouse and Universal to get their ducks in a row. But my fingers are so crossed. I think Tree [Gelbman] deserves her third and final chapter to bring that incredible character and franchise to a close or a new beginning.”

The movies delve into sci-fi territory with their repeated wormhole mechanics. The second leans heavily into this by utilizing an experimental quantum reactor as a plot device. Whether this apparatus will play into the third film isn’t clear. We will have to wait for the studio’s thumbs up or thumbs down to find out.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

Movies

Will ‘Scream VII’ Focus on The Prescott Family, Kids?

Published

on

Since the beginning of the Scream franchise, it seems there have been NDAs handed out to the cast to not reveal any plot details or casting choices. But clever internet sleuths can pretty much find anything these days thanks to the World Wide Web and report what they find as conjecture instead of fact. It’s not the best journalistic practice, but it gets buzz going and if Scream has done anything well over the past 20-plus years it’s creating buzz.

In the latest speculation of what Scream VII will be about, horror movie blogger and deduction king Critical Overlord posted in early April that casting agents for the horror movie are looking to hire actors for children’s roles. This has led to some believing Ghostface will target Sidney’s family bringing the franchise back to its roots where our final girl is once again vulnerable and afraid.

It is common knowledge now that Neve Campbell is returning to the Scream franchise after being low-balled by Spyglass for her part in Scream VI which led to her resignation. It’s also well-known that Melissa Barrera and Jenna Ortega won’t be back any time soon to play their respective roles as sisters Sam and Tara Carpenter. Execs scrambling to find their bearings got broadsided when director Cristopher Landon said he would also not be going forward with Scream VII as originally planned.

Enter Scream creator Kevin Williamson who is now directing the latest installment. But the Carpenter’s arc has been seemingly scrapped so which direction will he take his beloved films? Critical Overlord seems to think it will be a familial thriller.

This also piggy-backs news that Patrick Dempsey might return to the series as Sidney’s husband which was hinted at in Scream V. Additionally, Courteney Cox is also considering reprising her role as the badass journalist-turned-author Gale Weathers.

As the film starts filming in Canada sometime this year, it will be interesting to see how well they can keep the plot under wraps. Hopefully, those who don’t want any spoilers can avoid them through production. As for us, we liked an idea that would bring the franchise into the mega-meta universe.

This will be the third Scream sequel not directed by Wes Craven.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

Movies

‘Late Night With the Devil’ Brings The Fire to Streaming

Published

on

With as successful as a niche independent horror film can be at the box office, Late Night With the Devil is doing even better on streaming. 

The halfway-to-Halloween drop of Late Night With the Devil in March wasn’t out for even a month before it headed to streaming on April 19 where it remains as hot as Hades itself. It has the best opening ever for a movie on Shudder.

In its theatrical run, it is reported that the film took in $666K at the end of its opening weekend. That makes it the highest-grossing opener ever for a theatrical IFC film

Late Night With the Devil

“Coming off a record-breaking theatrical run, we’re thrilled to give Late Night its streaming debut on Shudder, as we continue to bring our passionate subscribers the very best in horror, with projects that represent the depth and breadth of this genre,” Courtney Thomasma, the EVP of streaming programming at AMC Networks told CBR. “Working alongside our sister company IFC Films to bring this fantastic film to an even broader audience is another example of the great synergy of these two brands and how the horror genre continues to resonate and be embraced by fans.”

Sam Zimmerman, Shudder’s VP of Programming loves that Late Night With the Devil fans are giving the film a second life on streaming. 

Late Night’s success across streaming and theatrical is a win for the kind of inventive, original genre that Shudder and IFC Films aim for,” he said. “A huge congratulations to the Cairnes and the fantastic filmmaking team.”

Since the pandemic theatrical releases have had a shorter shelf life in multiplexes thanks to the saturation of studio-owned streaming services; what took several months to hit streaming a decade ago now only takes several weeks and if you happen to be a niche subscription service like Shudder they can skip the PVOD market altogether and add a film directly to their library. 

Late Night With the Devil is also an exception because it received high praise from critics and therefore word of mouth fueled its popularity. Shudder subscribers can watch Late Night With the Devil right now on the platform.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading