Connect with us

News

Late to the Party: ‘Dolls’ (1987)

Published

on

Welcome back to another weekly edition of Late to the Party, the review series that pits iHorror writers against the cult classics and fan favorites we somehow haven’t seen. This week’s film is 1987’s “Dolls,” directed by Stuard Gordon, produced by Charles Band and Brian Yuzna, and written by Ed Naha.

If you’re like me and your earliest memories of horror fandom are from perusing the cover art in your local video rental store, then you probably remember this one:

Late to the Party: Dolls

Empire Pictures

Despite that amazing cover always sticking out to me, I never actually got around to seeing it until now. I’m particularly ashamed since I’m a big Stuart Gordon fan. Sadly, there’s no Jeffrey Combs here. He could’ve done so much with this wacky script, in a number of different roles.

Welcome to the Dollhouse

For a lean 77 minutes, “Dolls” takes a while to get started. It takes place in the English countryside, but we can only be certain it’s in Britain because everyone drives on the left side. The characters seem split between English and American.

We meet young Judy, her father David and her stepmother Rosemary. David and Rosemary just got married, and they’re spending their honeymoon driving through the country in a Rolls-Royce with Judy in tow. Rosemary is your typical evil stepmother, who considers Judy a burden and wants nothing to do with her. What’s a real surprise is that David doesn’t want her there either, and keeps reminding Rosemary that he only has custody of her for the summer. We learn that Rosemary is rich, so I don’t understand why David doesn’t just pay child support and leave Judy with her mother. Then again, this whole movie feels like it’s told from a child’s point of view. More on that later.

One of the best scenes in the film happens early on, when Rosemary throws Judy’s teddy bear, Teddy, into the bushes during a rainstorm. Teddy comes to life and emerges as a giant stuffed bear with actual teeth and claws, and slaughters Rosemary and David. However, that’s revealed to be Judy’s imagination, unfortunately.

They look for a place to hunker down and wait out the storm, and stumble upon a spooky old mansion inhabited by an elderly couple, Gabriel and Hilary, along with a buttload of dolls. They have no children of their own, but Gabriel is a toymaker who makes creepy dolls while Hilary puts the dolls in a baby carriage and walks them around the house in the middle of the night. Charming!

Late to the Party: Dolls

“I’m having a fucking tea party, what does it look like?”
Empire Pictures

The mansion itself does a lot of the heavy lifting for this film: It’s a gorgeous old house that would be at home in any gothic story. Each room has dozens of dolls, and you notice early on that the dolls eyes move.

Ralph, Enid and Isabel storm the party next. Enid and Isabel are two punk girls who are hoping to rob Ralph, and Ralph is an American tourist who’s hoping to score with one or both of them. Ralph also looks like a budget Sean Astin.

The punk girls seem out of place in this setting, even more so than the American characters. I don’t think they gave any explanation as to what they were doing in the middle of nowhere. Then again, no one really does. We see Isabel and Enid briefly hitchhiking in the opening scene. Then Ralph picked them up, and then his car died near the house.

Everyone ends up staying the night, and it’s only at this point that things start to pick up. It took a lot to bring this diverse cast of characters to this place, and that took me out of the movie more than the killer dolls. It reminded me of “Spookies” from the previous year, which had multiple unrelated groups wandering into an old house for various reasons just to add more fodder for the monsters. However, “Spookies” was one movie awkwardly shoehorned into another after the original creators bailed. I don’t think “Dolls” had the same issues to explain all the questions.

Late to the Party: Dolls

This “Little Rascals” remake is awfully dark.
Empire Pictures

The Valley of the Killer Dolls

The real stars of this film are the dolls. The stop-motion animation works well, and the dolls come off as vicious when they attack our human characters. They bite, they stab and some of them even use little toy guns, with lethal results.

I do have some questions about the dolls themselves, and most of their backstory is left to the viewer’s interpretation. When people fight back, some of the dolls are hollow and shatter easily, while others seem to have little skeletons inside them. It’s not entirely clear why some dolls are different, but one character gets turned into a doll as punishment. Are these humanoid dolls the souls of bad people, trapped in this house for eternity? It’s never really fully explained.

I’d almost classify “Dolls” as a dark fairy tale rather than a straight-up horror. It has a dreamlike quality and its own sense of morality. Children and adults who remember their childhood wonder are spared, while cynical adults are brutally murdered. Do the dolls know the difference? Are Gabriel and Hilary, the kindly old toymakers trapping people here in the bodies of dolls? Probably. What else are you going to do in a big old house in the countryside?

Overall, this film is uneven, and it seems to drag in places despite its short runtime. While it has its faults, but it’s still worth watching if you enjoy creepy dolls, Stuart Gordon, Brian Yuzna and dark fantasy. There isn’t a lot of gore, but the few gory scenes are impressive. For a relatively low budget of $2 million, the special effects by John Carl Buechler are impressive.

“Dolls” wasn’t a commercial success, but recently it’s become a cult favorite, thanks in part to a new collector’s edition Blu-ray from Shout! Factory.

Watch the trailer here:

Let us know what you thought of “Dolls.”

Stay tuned next week for more Late to the Party, or check out our past reviews here!

Listen to the 'Eye On Horror Podcast'

Listen to the 'Eye On Horror Podcast'

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Melissa Barrera Says Her ‘Scream’ Contract Never Included a Third Movie

Published

on

The Scream franchise has done a major overhaul to its original script for Scream VII after its two main leads departed production. Jenna Ortega who played Tara Carpenter left because she was overly booked and blessed while her co-star Melissa Barrera was fired after making political comments on social media.

But Barrera isn’t regretting any of it. In fact, she is happy where the character arc left off. She played Samantha Carpenter, the latest focus of the Ghostface killer.

Barrera did an exclusive interview with Collider. During their talk, the 33-year-old says she fulfilled her contract and her character Samantha’s arc finished at a good spot, even though it was meant to be a trilogy.

“I feel like the ending of [ Scream VI ] was a very good ending, and so I don’t feel like ‘Ugh, I got left in the middle.’ No, I think people, the fans, were wanting a third movie to continue that arc, and apparently, the plan was a trilogy, even though I was only contracted for two movies.

So, I did my two movies, and I’m fine. I’m good with that. I got two – that’s more than most people get. When you’re on a TV show, and it gets canceled, you can’t harp on things, you gotta move on.

That’s the nature of this industry too, I get excited for the next job, I get excited for the next skin I get to put on. It’s exciting to create a different character. So yeah, I feel good. I did what I set out to do. It was always meant to be two movies for me, ’cause that was my contract, and so everything is perfect.”

The entire production of the original seventh entry has moved on from the Carpenter’s storyline. With a new director and new script, production will resume, including the return of Neve Campbell and Courtney Cox.

Listen to the 'Eye On Horror Podcast'

Listen to the 'Eye On Horror Podcast'

Continue Reading

News

Read Reviews For ‘Abigail’ The Latest From Radio Silence

Published

on

The review embargo has lifted for the vampire horror movie Abigail and the reviews are abundantly positive. 

Matt BettinelliOlpin and Tyler Gillett of Radio Silence are getting early praise for their latest horror movie which opens on April 19. Unless you’re Barbie or Oppenheimer the name of the game in Hollywood is about what kind of box office numbers you pull on opening weekend and how much they drop thereafter. Abigail could be this year’s sleeper. 

Radio Silence is no stranger to opening big, their Scream reboot and sequel packed fans into seats on their respective opening dates. The duo are currently working on another reboot, that of 1981’s Kurt Russel cult favorite Escape From New York

Abigail

Now that ticket sales for GodzillaxKong, Dune 2, and Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire have gathered patina, Abigail could knock A24’s current powerhouse Civil War from the top spot, especially if ticket buyers base their purchase off reviews. If it is successful, it could be temporary, since Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone’s action comedy The Fall Guy opens on May 3, just two weeks later.

We have gathered pull quotes (good & bad) from some genre critics on Rotten Tomatoes (score for Abigail currently sits at 85%) to give you an indicator of how they are skewing ahead of its release this weekend. First, the good:

“Abigail is a fun, bloody ride. It also has the most lovable ensemble of morally grey characters this year. The film introduces a new favorite monster into the genre and gives her room to take the biggest swings possible. I lived!” — Sharai Bohannon: A Nightmare On Fierce Street Podcast

“The standout is Weir, commanding the screen despite her small stature and effortlessly switching from apparently helpless, terrified child to savage predator with a mordant sense of humor.” — Michael Gingold: Rue Morgue Magazine

“‘Abigail’ sets the bar as the most fun you can have with a horror movie of the year. In other words, “Abigail” is horror on pointe.” — BJ Colangelo: Slashfilm

“In what may become one of the greatest vampire movies of all time, Abigail provides an extremely bloody, fun, humorous & fresh take on the subgenre.” — Jordan Williams: Screen Rant

“Radio Silence have proven themselves as one of the most exciting, and crucially, fun, voices in the horror genre and Abigail takes this to the next level.” — Rosie Fletcher: Den of Geek

Now, the not-so-good:

“It’s not badly made, just uninspired and played out.” — Simon Abrams: RogerEbert.com

A ‘Ready or Not’ redux running on half the steam, this one-location misfire has plenty of parts that work but its namesake isn’t among them.” –Alison Foreman: indieWire

Let us know if you are planning to see Abigail. If or when you do, give us your hot take in the comments.

Listen to the 'Eye On Horror Podcast'

Listen to the 'Eye On Horror Podcast'

Continue Reading

Movies

Ernie Hudson To Star In ‘Oswald: Down The Rabbit Hole’

Published

on

Ernie Hudson

This is some exciting news! Ernie Hudson (Ghostbusters 1984, The Crow 1994) is set to star in the upcoming horror film titled Oswald: Down The Rabbit Hole. Hudson is set to play the character Oswald Jebediah Coleman who is a brilliant animator that is locked away in a terrifying magical prison. No release date has been announced yet. Check out the announcement trailer and more about the film below.

ANNOUNCEMENT TRAILER FOR OSWALD: DOWN THE RABBIT HOLE

The film follows the story of “Art and some of his closest friends as they help track down his long-lost family lineage. When they find and explore his Great-Grandpa Oswald’s abandoned home, they encounter a magical TV that teleports them to a place lost in time, shrouded by dark Hollywood Magic. The group finds that they are not alone when they discover Oswald’s come-to-life cartoon Rabbit, a dark entity that decides their souls are it’s for the taking. Art and his friends must work together to escape their magical prison before the Rabbit gets to them first.”

First Look Image at Oswald: Down the Rabbit Hole

Ernie Hudson stated that “I am excited to work with everyone on this production. It’s an incredibly creative and smart project.”

Director Stewart also added “I had a very specific vision for Oswald’s character and knew I wanted Ernie for this role from the start, as I’ve always admired iconic cinematic legacy. Ernie is going to bring Oswald’s unique and vengeful spirit to life in the best way possible.”

First Look Image at Oswald: Down the Rabbit Hole

Lilton Stewart III and Lucinda Bruce are teaming up to write and direct the film. It stars actors Ernie Hudson (Ghostbusters 1984, The Crow 1994), Topher Hall (Single Drunk Female 2022), and Yasha Rayzberg (A Rainbow in the Dark 2021). Mana Animation Studio is helping produce the animation, Tandem Post House for post-production, and VFX supervisor Bob Homami is also helping. The budget for the film currently sits at $4.5M.

Official Teaser Poster for Oswald: Down the Rabbit Hole

This is one of many classic childhood stories that are being turned into horror films. This list includes Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey 2, Bambi: The Reckoning, Mickey’s Mouse Trap, The Return of Steamboat Willie, and many more. Are you more interested in the film now that Ernie Hudson is attached to star in it? Let us know in the comments below.

Listen to the 'Eye On Horror Podcast'

Listen to the 'Eye On Horror Podcast'

Continue Reading