Connect with us

News

Was the ‘Ghost Adventures Live’ Halloween Special Worth the Hype?

Published

on

Another spooky Halloween season has come and gone, and with it, yet another live paranormal investigation from the beloved Ghost Adventures crew. Led by their fearless (is fearless the right word?) leader Zak Bagans, this year’s investigation took place in the highly active and supernatural ‘Haunted Museum’, which is owned by Bagans himself, and was put together from his personal collection of rare and ghostly oddities.

The crown jewel of the artifacts and climax of the Halloween special is a small, wooden, wine box known as the Dybbuk Box. It is believed to be one of the most haunted objects in the world, and contains a malicious Dybbuk spirit that has the ability to haunt and even possess those who come into contact with it. The box was also the inspiration for the 2012 film The Possession, starring Jeffrey Dean Morgan.

Numerous owners of the box have reported strange and horrifying phenomena that accompany it, including terrible nightmares, intense depression and serious health issues. According to the previous owner, Kevin Mannis, the contents within the box consist of two 1920s pennies, a lock of blonde hair, a lock of dark brown hair, a small statue engraved with the Hebrew word “Shalom”, a gold wine goblet, one dried rose bud, and a single candle holder with four octopus-shaped legs.

via Las Vegas Review-Journal

For weeks leading up to the live investigation, Bagans consulted the opinions of professionals within the field, family members and his devoted fans, as to whether or not he should remove the glass case surrounding the cursed box and open the possessed cabinet. While the consensus was fairly split, many viewers tuned in Halloween night to see what consequences would befall Bagans and his team of experts.

Arriving in a black, 1968 Camaro that was previously owned by the infamous Waco cult leader David Koresh, Zak Bagans made quite an entrance to his ‘Haunted Museum’ in the heart of downtown Las Vegas. When asked if he would be opening the Dybbuk box that evening, Bagans stated that he had still not made his final decision on the matter. He also noted that in the days leading up to the haunting event, he had began to feel ill and fatigued, and believed it to be a direct result of his claims to open the box.

via Las Vegas Review-Journal

Throughout the course of the four hour special, the Ghost Adventures squad and various experts investigated many of the prized possessions and spirited rooms within the museum. Some of the paranormal focus centered on the famous “Lilly Doll”, Bela Lugosi’s mirror, a rather strange confrontation that took place in the basement between “Lady Snake” and a self proclaimed “good witch”, and of course, the dreaded Dybbuk box.

After quite a bit of tension-building and countless “Did you hear that?” remarks that could easily turn the 4 hour special into a Halloween drinking game, Zak and his team decided to remove the glass case that displays the box. But as the show came to its epic conclusion, Bagans made the executive decision NOT to open it, stating that with the amount of bad energy and immense paranormal activity that was witnessed throughout the evening, he did not want to put himself or his team in any more potential danger.

Countless fans tweeted their relief over Zak’s decision not to open the Dybbuk box, but many viewers felt that the host and his crew may have hyped up the scare factor just a little too much. Considering that the box has already been opened and photographed in the past, was there really such a dark presence surrounding the Ghost Adventures team that their lives were actually in danger?

There is no denying that Zak Bagans has collected some one-of-a-kind items for his spooky exhibit, but everyone reacts to the supernatural differently. Next time you’re visiting Sin City, be sure to stop by the ‘Haunted Museum’ and let us know your own experience with the infamous Dybbuk box.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Russell Crowe To Star in Another Exorcism Movie & It’s Not a Sequel

Published

on

Maybe it’s because The Exorcist just celebrated its 50th-anniversary last year, or maybe it’s because aging Academy Award-winning actors aren’t too proud to take on obscure roles, but Russell Crowe is visiting the Devil once again in yet another possession film. And it’s not related to his last one, The Pope’s Exorcist.

According to Collider, the film titled The Exorcism was originally going to be released under the name The Georgetown Project. Rights for its North American release were once in the hands of Miramax but then went to Vertical Entertainment. It will release on June 7 in theaters then head over to Shudder for subscribers.

Crowe will also star in this year’s upcoming Kraven the Hunter which is set to drop in theaters on August 30.

As for The Exorcism, Collider provides us with what it’s about:

“The film centers around actor Anthony Miller (Crowe), whose troubles come to the forefront as he shoots a supernatural horror movie. His estranged daughter (Ryan Simpkins) has to figure out whether he’s lapsing into his past addictions, or if something even more horrific is occurring. “

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

Movies

New F-Bomb Laden ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Trailer: Bloody Buddy Movie

Published

on

Deadpool & Wolverine might be the buddy movie of the decade. The two heterodox superheroes are back in the latest trailer for the summer blockbuster, this time with more f-bombs than a gangster film.

‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Movie Trailer

This time the focus is on Wolverine played by Hugh Jackman. The adamantium-infused X-Man is having a bit of a pity party when Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) arrives on the scene who then tries to convince him to team up for selfish reasons. The result is a profanity-filled trailer with a Strange surprise at the end.

Deadpool & Wolverine is one of the most anticipated movies of the year. It comes out on July 26. Here is the latest trailer, and we suggest if you are at work and your space isn’t private, you might want to put in headphones.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

News

Original Blair Witch Cast Ask Lionsgate for Retroactive Residuals in Light of New Film

Published

on

The Blair Witch Project Cast

Jason Blum is planning to reboot The Blair Witch Project for the second time. That’s a fairly large task considering none of the reboots or sequels have managed to capture the magic of the 1999 film that brought found footage into the mainstream.

This idea has not been lost on the original Blair Witch cast, who has recently reached out to Lionsgate to ask for what they feel is fair compensation for their role in the pivotal film. Lionsgate gained access to The Blair Witch Project in 2003 when they purchased Artisan Entertainment.

Blair witch
The Blair Witch Project Cast

However, Artisan Entertainment was an independent studio before its purchase, meaning the actors were not part of SAG-AFTRA. As a result, the cast are not entitled to the same residuals from the project as actors in other major films. The cast doesn’t feel that the studio should be able to continue to profit off of their hard work and likenesses without fair compensation.

Their most recent request asks for “meaningful consultation on any future ‘Blair Witch’ reboot, sequel, prequel, toy, game, ride, escape room, etc., in which one could reasonably assume that Heather, Michael & Josh’s names and/or likenesses will be associated for promotional purposes in the public sphere.”

The blair witch project

At this time, Lionsgate has not offered any comment about this issue.

The full statement made by the cast can be found below.

OUR ASKS OF LIONSGATE (From Heather, Michael & Josh, stars of “The Blair Witch Project”):

1. Retroactive + future residual payments to Heather, Michael and Josh for acting services rendered in the original BWP, equivalent to the sum that would’ve been allotted through SAG-AFTRA, had we had proper union or legal representation when the film was made.

2. Meaningful consultation on any future Blair Witch reboot, sequel, prequel, toy, game, ride, escape room, etc…, in which one could reasonably assume that Heather, Michael & Josh’s names and/or likenesses will be associated for promotional purposes in the public sphere.

Note: Our film has now been rebooted twice, both times were a disappointment from a fan/box office/critical perspective. Neither of these films were made with significant creative input from the original team. As the insiders who created the Blair Witch and have been listening to what fans love & want for 25 years, we’re your single greatest, yet thus-far un-utilized secret-weapon!

3. “The Blair Witch Grant”: A 60k grant (the budget of our original movie), paid out yearly by Lionsgate, to an unknown/aspiring genre filmmaker to assist in making theirfirst feature film. This is a GRANT, not a development fund, hence Lionsgate will not own any of the underlying rights to the project.

A PUBLIC STATEMENT FROM THE DIRECTORS & PRODUCERS OF “THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT”:

As we near the 25th anniversary of The Blair Witch Project, our pride in the storyworld we created and the film we produced is reaffirmed by the recent announcement of a reboot by horror icons Jason Blum and James Wan.

While we, the original filmmakers, respect Lionsgate’s right to monetize the intellectual property as it sees fit, we must highlight the significant contributions of the original cast — Heather Donahue, Joshua Leonard, and Mike Williams. As the literal faces of what has become a franchise, their likenesses, voices, and real names are inseparably tied to The Blair Witch Project. Their unique contributions not only defined the film’s authenticity but continue to resonate with audiences around the world.

We celebrate our film’s legacy, and equally, we believe the actors deserve to be celebrated for their enduring association with the franchise.

Sincerely, Eduardo Sanchez, Dan Myrick, Gregg Hale, Robin Cowie, and Michael Monello

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading