Connect with us

News

Late to the Party: Young Frankenstein (1974)

Published

on

Though I would never be confused with an aficionado, someone who had consumed every film or book helmed by Gene Wilder, I felt the cinematic magnitude of his death on August 29. Much like virtually everyone who’d seen Wilder in films like Blazing Saddles, The Producers, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory and Stir Crazy, I was a fan.

Few had ever been as calm and gentle or as warm and funny as Wilder, so thoughts of his collaborations with Mel Brooks and Richard Pryor began dancing through my head along with the desire to revisit some of those phenomenal works of comedic genius.

That’s when my mind turned to a friend who was constantly quoting Space Balls and History of the World: Part I, and urging me to sample more Brooks fare.

With that in mind, I instantly ran out to pick up a copy of Young Frankenstein, another flick said friend chuckled about often, and was not disappointed.

The film’s premise was that Wilder was a brilliant scientist doing all he could to make the world forget the madman antics of his grandfather, but once given the opportunity, had the “itch” to determine whether he could see reanimation through without the catastrophic end of his predecessor.

For the life of me, I can’t recall who’d said it on Twitter, but they’d noted that the ultimate compliment they could pay Jaws was that they would gladly watch a feature film centered on any of the main characters from the Steven Spielberg classic. That sentiment holds true for me with Young Frankenstein.

Ensemble casts are almost always a joy, with varied talents on display for our delightful consumption, and Young Frankenstein may be the best of the bunch.

Though Brooks did not appear on screen for this film, his voice could be heard off camera on several occasions, and his decision (along with Wilder’s) to pay homage to the Boris Karloff and Elsa Lanchester-led Frankenstein films while satarizing them was spot on. The call to move forward in black and white with an exaggerated look from the original pictures was one questioned by the studio at the time, but in retrospect, was absolutely spot on.

It gave the film an old time feel, and as with all Brooks projects, it glowed with the atmosphere and charm of a stage production. And the stage is the finest venue to showcase immeasurable talent.

yfCalm and composed with the occasional moment of lunacy, Wilder was incomprable. From the insistence that his last name be pronounced Fronken-steen so as to distance himself from his “cuckoo” grandfather to “mother-grabbing” knees to the groin of a subdued test subject to “Put the candle back,” Wilder was at his best, which is a profound statement.

Of course, Wilder had written the original screenplay, but once he and Brooks developed the final project, it was a veritable smorgasbord for a cast which proved absolutely ravenous.

The laughs are legion with Marty Feldman, whose eyes alone could have been a character unto themselves, a fact not lost on Wilder or Brooks. Feldman was masterful in countering Wilder’s pronunciation of Frankenstein with Eye-gore, and his own idea to switch his character’s hump from one side to the other throughout was pure genius. In a way, the whole film revolved around Feldman.

However, Feldman was not alone with regard to standout performances, and their praises must be sung.

Teri Garr’s German accent and sexual innuendo never seemed forced, and lingered just long enough for the audience to catch the meaning and laugh as the group moved to the next joke.

Whereas Inspector Kemp was a necessary character which could have been a throwaway, Kenneth Mars gave it the Benicio Del Toro treatment twenty years before we even knew who Fenster was. Mars gave the good inspector a robotic way of moving and almost indecipherable manner of speech that ate up the screen whenever he was appeared in a scene.

Cloris Leachman’s improvisational Ovaltine and the running gag of Frau Blucher never got old, and the intensity with which she straightly played the character was creepy and hysterical at once.

Though Peter Boyle was known best as Ray Romano’s father from “Everybody Loses Raymond,” his portrayal of the monster brought the whole film together. While physically imposing, it was Boyle’s wry smirks and joke set-ups that landed the largest laughs. With top hat and tails and a grunted “Puttin’ on the Ritz,” a brief but unforgettable scene with Gene Hackman and glance at the audience after the little girl by the lake asked what else they could toss into the water, Boyle’s timing was spot on with (almost) nary a word spoken.

I’d be remiss, however, if I didn’t focus attention on Madeline Khan. The woman was an absolute marvel. Who has ever been funnier than Madeline Khan? The perfect combination of beauty, talent and hilarity, Khan absolutely destroyed every moment she was featured, and my biggest laugh came from the schwanzstucker payoff when Khan broke into “Oh, Sweet Mystery.” All of Khan’s innumerable talents were on display in Young Frankenstein, not the least of which was that voice. It cannot be stressed enough — though Madeline Khan may no longer be with us, referring to her skills in the past tense would be an injustice — she is a national treasure.

The brilliance of Wilder and Brooks were on full display with Young Frankenstein, and the ensemble cast offered a humor and charm that cannot be replicated. The theatrical background of Wilder and Brooks was palpable throughout, and the finished product was the better for it.

If you have not seen Young Frankenstein, I implore you to remedy that as quickly as possible, because it opened the door for The Evil Dead franchise, Shaun of the Dead and Zombieland, and is perhaps the finest horror comedy ever produced.

Be sure to check back for next Wednesday’s Late to the Party when Jonathan Correia tackles the first three installments of Paranormal Activity.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Movies

The Original ‘Beetlejuice’ Sequel Had an Interesting Location

Published

on

beetlejuice in Hawaii Movie

Back in the late ’80s and early ’90s sequels to hit movies weren’t as linear as they are today. It was more like “let’s re-do the situation but in a different location.” Remember Speed 2, or National Lampoon’s European Vacation? Even Aliens, as good as it is, follows a lot of the plot points of the original; people stuck on a ship, an android, a little girl in peril instead of a cat. So it makes sense that one of the most popular supernatural comedies of all time, Beetlejuice would follow the same pattern.

In 1991 Tim Burton was interested in doing a sequel to his 1988 original, it was called Beetlejuice Goes Hawaiian:

“The Deetz family moves to Hawaii to develop a resort. Construction begins, and it’s quickly discovered that the hotel will be sitting on top of an ancient burial ground. Beetlejuice comes in to save the day.”

Burton liked the script but wanted some re-writes so he asked then-hot screenwriter Daniel Waters who had just got done contributing to Heathers. He passed on the opportunity so producer David Geffen offered it to Troop Beverly Hills scribe Pamela Norris to no avail.

Eventually, Warner Bros. asked Kevin Smith to punch up Beetlejuice Goes Hawaiian, he scoffed at the idea, saying, “Didn’t we say all we needed to say in the first Beetlejuice? Must we go tropical?”

Nine years later the sequel was killed. The studio said Winona Ryder was now too old for the part and an entire re-cast needed to happen. But Burton never gave up, there were a lot of directions he wanted to take his characters, including a Disney crossover.

“We talked about lots of different things,” the director said in Entertainment Weekly. “That was early on when we were going, Beetlejuice and the Haunted MansionBeetlejuice Goes West, whatever. Lots of things came up.”

Fast-forward to 2011 when another script was pitched for a sequel. This time the writer of Burton’s Dark Shadows,  Seth Grahame-Smith was hired and he wanted to make sure the story wasn’t a cash-grabbing remake or reboot. Four years later, in 2015, a script was approved with both Ryder and Keaton saying they would return to their respective roles. In 2017 that script was revamped and then eventually shelved in 2019.

During the time the sequel script was being tossed around in Hollywood, in 2016 an artist named Alex Murillo posted what looked like one-sheets for a Beetlejuice sequel. Although they were fabricated and had no affiliation with Warner Bros. people thought they were real.

Perhaps the virality of the artwork sparked interest in a Beetlejuice sequel once again, and finally, it was confirmed in 2022 Beetlejuice 2 had a green light from a script written by Wednesday writers  Alfred Gough and Miles Millar. The star of that series Jenna Ortega signed on to the new movie with filming starting in 2023. It was also confirmed that Danny Elfman would return to do the score.

Burton and Keaton agreed that the new film titled Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice wouldn’t rely on CGI or other other forms of technology. They wanted the film to feel “handmade.” The film wrapped in November 2023.

It’s been over three decades to come up with a sequel to Beetlejuice. Hopefully, since they said aloha to Beetlejuice Goes Hawaiian there has been enough time and creativity to ensure Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice will not only honor the characters, but fans of the original.

Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice will open theatrically on September 6.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

News

Russell Crowe To Star in Another Exorcism Movie & It’s Not a Sequel

Published

on

Maybe it’s because The Exorcist just celebrated its 50th-anniversary last year, or maybe it’s because aging Academy Award-winning actors aren’t too proud to take on obscure roles, but Russell Crowe is visiting the Devil once again in yet another possession film. And it’s not related to his last one, The Pope’s Exorcist.

According to Collider, the film titled The Exorcism was originally going to be released under the name The Georgetown Project. Rights for its North American release were once in the hands of Miramax but then went to Vertical Entertainment. It will release on June 7 in theaters then head over to Shudder for subscribers.

Crowe will also star in this year’s upcoming Kraven the Hunter which is set to drop in theaters on August 30.

As for The Exorcism, Collider provides us with what it’s about:

“The film centers around actor Anthony Miller (Crowe), whose troubles come to the forefront as he shoots a supernatural horror movie. His estranged daughter (Ryan Simpkins) has to figure out whether he’s lapsing into his past addictions, or if something even more horrific is occurring. “

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

Movies

New F-Bomb Laden ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Trailer: Bloody Buddy Movie

Published

on

Deadpool & Wolverine might be the buddy movie of the decade. The two heterodox superheroes are back in the latest trailer for the summer blockbuster, this time with more f-bombs than a gangster film.

‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Movie Trailer

This time the focus is on Wolverine played by Hugh Jackman. The adamantium-infused X-Man is having a bit of a pity party when Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) arrives on the scene who then tries to convince him to team up for selfish reasons. The result is a profanity-filled trailer with a Strange surprise at the end.

Deadpool & Wolverine is one of the most anticipated movies of the year. It comes out on July 26. Here is the latest trailer, and we suggest if you are at work and your space isn’t private, you might want to put in headphones.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading