Connect with us

News

Horror Movie Anniversaries: Celebrating 30 Years Of The Fly

Published

on

Written by Patti Pauley

Thirty years ago today, something absolutely wonderful burst its way onto the horror movie market. David Cronenberg’s The Fly changed the way we looked at pesky poo-loving insects indefinitely, and I wanted to take a moment of my time to appreciate the gorgeous horror tragedy that has managed to keep us delightfully entertained and continually makes us vomit in our mouths a little three decades after the initial widespread theatrical release. Many horror bloggers before me have written about their fondness for this 1986 gem, and it’s a beautiful thing honestly. I’m not exactly sure what I can say that already hasn’t been stated about this national treasure, but I’m absolutely not going to let that stop me from giving a deserving nod to one of the greatest films to come out of the eighties.

fly giphy

 

 

If you’re going to remake a classic horror film, this is how it’s done.

brundlefly

 

For those who had no unearthly idea, the Cronenberg masterpiece is actually a remake of the 1958 science-fiction horror that starred the talents of David Hedison, Patricia Owens, and Vincent Price. The original is a classic film from an era that was learning how to push boundaries within film. In 1986, the remake that stars Geena Davis, John Getz, and launched Jeff Goldblum into superstar status, not only pushed the grotesque card, but did it in such a way that it was disgustingly beautiful. in 1958 you felt a little bad for the character of Andre (Hedison). I mean, the guy had the head and the hand of an insect. It was pretty shitty. But we never really felt THAT bad for the character, given the fact there really wasn’t a ton of human screen time for him. Goldblum’s character of Seth Brundle however, hits all the feels. His transformation into Brundlefly was painful and tragic on so many levels. In many ways, it’s not just a horror/ sci-fi film. It’s a love story gone terribly wrong. Watching Davis’ character of Veronica gazing upon on what is speculated as the love of her life, suffering from this mishap, is more than heartbreaking. The film dives miles deep into character emotions and if you don’t feel it, you sir have a heart of molasses.

 

Seriously, the monster magic is some of the best I’ve ever seen.

tumblr_norgl70lYy1rp0vkjo1_500

Sure, it may be a little under the radar if you’re comparing it to today’s technology, but when we’re talking practical effects you have to give a standing ovation to the special effects and make-up department. The Fly is not only a triumph in storytelling, but in the visual effects as well. Makeup wizards Chris Walas and Stephen Doo Pwah deservedly won an academy award for their makeup effects on The Fly, but they didn’t forget to thank the actor who brought Brundlefly to life. With the collaboration of these genius and stomach-turning prosthetics, and Goldblum’s brilliant acting chops, this movie gave us the most disgusting character that we’ve ever fallen in love with. Ever. After Seth Brundle steps out of a telepod that unknowingly to him, fused his DNA with that of a fly, his transformation begins slowly almost by the hour it seems into something eventually unrecognizable. With every layer of make-up, Goldblum submerged himself an inch deeper into the beast of Brundlefly. As we inch to the close of the film, the monstrous puppet that was used for the final result is a beautifully built piece of art that both horrifies and saddens us as we remember the innocent and bright soul underneath.

brundle fly transformation animation

Let’s talk about that controversial deleted scene, shall we?

the-fly-cat-monkey

The deleted scene that was hidden from the public until a special two-disc DVD was released containing the footage, was originally cut from the film after an audience test screening in Toronto. According to Producer Stuart Cornfield, the theater guests were disgusted to the point of projectile vomit. The movie has some pretty nasty scenes that could definitely make someone gag a little, but I suppose this really was just a bit much for some. Apparently the general public didn’t take to kindly to Brundle experimenting on helpless animals and then bludgeoning them to death. Understandable. The scene had it been kept in, would make some folks take away any pity they may had for Seth, turning him from a helpless victim to animal-murdering dickbag. However, I can see what they were ultimately aiming for and from what I took from the scene, was an act of complete desperation. Brundle was halfway through his transformation and scrambling to find a cure as time was running short. You could see the defeat in his mangled face after the terribly gone wrong experiment on the roof, and ummm, ripping off an insect leg that had spawned from his stomach with his mouth. The whole scene is slightly painful to watch, but at least for me, not in a bad sense. There are a LOT of scenes from this film that will make you squirm. In my opinion, the scene with the dog in The Fly 2 was way worse than this.

 

The Fly is considered David Cronenberg’s crowning achievement in horror films, and I won’t disagree. It is truly a masterpiece in the sense of just how fragile life really is and the feelings the film evokes from your senses. It is so rare folks, that a horror movie such as this comes along that is done extraordinarily well in every goddamn aspect. Imaginative, compelling, and the dehumanization of what was once a curious man who has been forced into “insect politics”, is brilliant every time you view it. The Fly turns 30 years-old today. Don’t be afraid to pop that groundbreaking film into your DVD player in honor of not only of one of the best remakes, but also one of the greatest horror films of the twentieth century.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BzwxJ-M_M0

 

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Russell Crowe To Star in Another Exorcism Movie & It’s Not a Sequel

Published

on

Maybe it’s because The Exorcist just celebrated its 50th-anniversary last year, or maybe it’s because aging Academy Award-winning actors aren’t too proud to take on obscure roles, but Russell Crowe is visiting the Devil once again in yet another possession film. And it’s not related to his last one, The Pope’s Exorcist.

According to Collider, the film titled The Exorcism was originally going to be released under the name The Georgetown Project. Rights for its North American release were once in the hands of Miramax but then went to Vertical Entertainment. It will release on June 7 in theaters then head over to Shudder for subscribers.

Crowe will also star in this year’s upcoming Kraven the Hunter which is set to drop in theaters on August 30.

As for The Exorcism, Collider provides us with what it’s about:

“The film centers around actor Anthony Miller (Crowe), whose troubles come to the forefront as he shoots a supernatural horror movie. His estranged daughter (Ryan Simpkins) has to figure out whether he’s lapsing into his past addictions, or if something even more horrific is occurring. “

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

Movies

New F-Bomb Laden ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Trailer: Bloody Buddy Movie

Published

on

Deadpool & Wolverine might be the buddy movie of the decade. The two heterodox superheroes are back in the latest trailer for the summer blockbuster, this time with more f-bombs than a gangster film.

‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Movie Trailer

This time the focus is on Wolverine played by Hugh Jackman. The adamantium-infused X-Man is having a bit of a pity party when Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) arrives on the scene who then tries to convince him to team up for selfish reasons. The result is a profanity-filled trailer with a Strange surprise at the end.

Deadpool & Wolverine is one of the most anticipated movies of the year. It comes out on July 26. Here is the latest trailer, and we suggest if you are at work and your space isn’t private, you might want to put in headphones.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

News

Original Blair Witch Cast Ask Lionsgate for Retroactive Residuals in Light of New Film

Published

on

The Blair Witch Project Cast

Jason Blum is planning to reboot The Blair Witch Project for the second time. That’s a fairly large task considering none of the reboots or sequels have managed to capture the magic of the 1999 film that brought found footage into the mainstream.

This idea has not been lost on the original Blair Witch cast, who has recently reached out to Lionsgate to ask for what they feel is fair compensation for their role in the pivotal film. Lionsgate gained access to The Blair Witch Project in 2003 when they purchased Artisan Entertainment.

Blair witch
The Blair Witch Project Cast

However, Artisan Entertainment was an independent studio before its purchase, meaning the actors were not part of SAG-AFTRA. As a result, the cast are not entitled to the same residuals from the project as actors in other major films. The cast doesn’t feel that the studio should be able to continue to profit off of their hard work and likenesses without fair compensation.

Their most recent request asks for “meaningful consultation on any future ‘Blair Witch’ reboot, sequel, prequel, toy, game, ride, escape room, etc., in which one could reasonably assume that Heather, Michael & Josh’s names and/or likenesses will be associated for promotional purposes in the public sphere.”

The blair witch project

At this time, Lionsgate has not offered any comment about this issue.

The full statement made by the cast can be found below.

OUR ASKS OF LIONSGATE (From Heather, Michael & Josh, stars of “The Blair Witch Project”):

1. Retroactive + future residual payments to Heather, Michael and Josh for acting services rendered in the original BWP, equivalent to the sum that would’ve been allotted through SAG-AFTRA, had we had proper union or legal representation when the film was made.

2. Meaningful consultation on any future Blair Witch reboot, sequel, prequel, toy, game, ride, escape room, etc…, in which one could reasonably assume that Heather, Michael & Josh’s names and/or likenesses will be associated for promotional purposes in the public sphere.

Note: Our film has now been rebooted twice, both times were a disappointment from a fan/box office/critical perspective. Neither of these films were made with significant creative input from the original team. As the insiders who created the Blair Witch and have been listening to what fans love & want for 25 years, we’re your single greatest, yet thus-far un-utilized secret-weapon!

3. “The Blair Witch Grant”: A 60k grant (the budget of our original movie), paid out yearly by Lionsgate, to an unknown/aspiring genre filmmaker to assist in making theirfirst feature film. This is a GRANT, not a development fund, hence Lionsgate will not own any of the underlying rights to the project.

A PUBLIC STATEMENT FROM THE DIRECTORS & PRODUCERS OF “THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT”:

As we near the 25th anniversary of The Blair Witch Project, our pride in the storyworld we created and the film we produced is reaffirmed by the recent announcement of a reboot by horror icons Jason Blum and James Wan.

While we, the original filmmakers, respect Lionsgate’s right to monetize the intellectual property as it sees fit, we must highlight the significant contributions of the original cast — Heather Donahue, Joshua Leonard, and Mike Williams. As the literal faces of what has become a franchise, their likenesses, voices, and real names are inseparably tied to The Blair Witch Project. Their unique contributions not only defined the film’s authenticity but continue to resonate with audiences around the world.

We celebrate our film’s legacy, and equally, we believe the actors deserve to be celebrated for their enduring association with the franchise.

Sincerely, Eduardo Sanchez, Dan Myrick, Gregg Hale, Robin Cowie, and Michael Monello

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading